John

A classic!

Revisado: 11-16-23

Wonderful first person account!
Narrator’s mispronunciations we’re irksome (victuals, ague, adjutant, etc,) but otherwise it fit the subject of the story.

Has calificado esta reseña.

Reportaste esta reseña

Informative Book—Terrible Narrator

Revisado: 09-09-21

The book provides good coverage of the war as a whole, with major focus on events post-Saratoga. Ferling laid out an interesting framework for the book at the outset, but failed to explain how that framework played out as he described the events. He would explain events but did not summarize how these events fit the framework as he went along.
Rhett Samuel Price made the book difficult to listen to because of his constant and frequent mispronunciations. Apart from the partially excusable problems with French names, he often mispronounced common English words (e.g., “sow” for “sew”). I found my listening was distracted by such mispronunciations. I am amazed that the producers of this book’s narration let it become public.

Has calificado esta reseña.

Reportaste esta reseña

Wonderful book! Terrible editing and narration.

Revisado: 12-11-14

Would you recommend this book to a friend? Why or why not?

Yes, because this is a seminal book in understanding the actual functioning of the British army on campaign in North America during the revolutionary war. Excellent use of first person accounts. Some of the material is dense but it's written clearly. Unfortunately, the narrator was not up to the task of bringing this fascinating account to live. I urge the potential listener to persevere, the content is worth it.

What was one of the most memorable moments of With Zeal and with Bayonets Only?

There is no single memorable moment. Overall however, Matthew Spring smashes long-held (and erroneous) beliefs about how the British Army conducted warfare when on campaign during the Revolutionary War. The opening chapters and the contemporary accounts cited liberally throughout the book help the reader understand strategy and tactics employed by the British army, how the army adapted to warfare on the North American continent, and why suppression of the revolution was a doomed enterprise from the outset. I might add, that to me at least, there appear to be obvious parallels between the British strategy and tactics, the rebel response, the geographical and physical context of the war, and the US prosecution of the war in Vietnam.

How could the performance have been better?

This book deserves a better narrator. Non-fiction history requires oral reading skills that the narrator does not possess. The major flaw with this performance is that about the beginning of Chapter Nine (a couple of hours into the second download) the Editors were asleep at the wheel. As a result, the listener will hear 30-45 minutes of the narrator stopping, starting, repeating words and phrases, stumbling over names, trying several different inflections, clearing his throat, making side comments, and the like. It's clear that either no one at the production company listened to the whole book, or they mistakenly uploaded the wrong version. I simply had to skip much of that chapter. Were I the author, I'd be foaming at the mouth.

If this book were a movie would you go see it?

Yes, and it would be an interesting movie too!

Any additional comments?

I've notified Audible about the problems with Chapter Nine, but have not heard back from them. I hope they will put up a properly edited version soon!

Has calificado esta reseña.

Reportaste esta reseña

esto le resultó útil a 5 personas