Greg B.
- 1
- revisión
- 0
- votos útiles
- 1
- clasificación
-
Short Circuiting Policy
- Interest Groups and the Battle Over Clean Energy and Climate Policy in the American States
- De: Leah Cardamore Stokes
- Narrado por: Teri Schnaubelt
- Duración: 13 h y 5 m
- Versión completa
-
General
-
Narración:
-
Historia
In 1999, Texas passed a landmark clean energy law, beginning a groundswell of new policies that promised to make the US a world leader in renewable energy. As Leah Stokes shows in Short Circuiting Policy, however, that policy did not lead to momentum in Texas, which failed to implement its solar laws or clean up its electricity system. Examining clean energy laws in Texas, Kansas, Arizona, and Ohio over 30 years Stokes argues that organized combat between advocate and opponent interest groups is central to explaining why states are not on track to address the climate crisis.
-
-
Realpolitik
- De Catherine en 12-30-20
- Short Circuiting Policy
- Interest Groups and the Battle Over Clean Energy and Climate Policy in the American States
- De: Leah Cardamore Stokes
- Narrado por: Teri Schnaubelt
Faux-green Propaganda
Revisado: 01-11-25
Professor Stokes pushes the Green New Scam, describing climate realists with the pejorative "denier" label. She would be well-served by watching a talk by Greenpeace founder Dr. Patrick Moore, or reading Dr. Eric Karlstrom's "Disproofs of Man-Induced Global Warming". Al Gore convinced many environmentalists to adopt the fight against Global Warming with his now-discredited hockey stick graph. While his followers' intentions were undoubtedly good in the beginning, it is inexcusable to continue to promote this false narrative after subsequent debate has revealed the truth of the matter--that anthropogenic greenhouse gasses do not drive climate. Countless dollars have been spent on producing failed catastrophe-predicting computer models (garbage in, garbage out), and even more has gone to the interest groups selling bird-chopping, whale-killing, environment-destroying windmills, toxic solar panels, anti-human artificial scarcity, unfounded fear, and government control. There is nothing "clean" about most so-called "clean energy", and it is a disgrace that once-respected institutions like the University of California system are funding peddlers of this pseudoscientific narrative.
Se ha producido un error. Vuelve a intentarlo dentro de unos minutos.
Has calificado esta reseña.
Reportaste esta reseña