OYENTE

Peter G

  • 11
  • opiniones
  • 3
  • votos útiles
  • 254
  • calificaciones

another good installment

Total
5 out of 5 stars
Ejecución
5 out of 5 stars
Historia
5 out of 5 stars

Revisado: 09-24-23

nice to see that Glynn Stewart has been able to shift the main character focus to an earlier character as Damian has become to senior to be in the field.

Se ha producido un error. Vuelve a intentarlo dentro de unos minutos.

Has calificado esta reseña.

Reportaste esta reseña

well researched

Total
5 out of 5 stars
Ejecución
5 out of 5 stars
Historia
5 out of 5 stars

Revisado: 09-17-23

excellent book with a great narrator. Glynn has done his homework for space navy design and space combat.

Se ha producido un error. Vuelve a intentarlo dentro de unos minutos.

Has calificado esta reseña.

Reportaste esta reseña

a worth addition to the series

Total
5 out of 5 stars
Ejecución
5 out of 5 stars
Historia
5 out of 5 stars

Revisado: 09-15-23

Great story, especially building on jump techniques from earlier books. The narrator was an excellent fit.

Se ha producido un error. Vuelve a intentarlo dentro de unos minutos.

Has calificado esta reseña.

Reportaste esta reseña

Honor Harrington with magic

Total
5 out of 5 stars
Ejecución
5 out of 5 stars
Historia
5 out of 5 stars

Revisado: 06-22-23

He has the understanding of space navies similar to David Weber. Different type of FTL and siciety, but they fit together on top of a great story. There are also indications he's familiar with David Webers works.

Se ha producido un error. Vuelve a intentarlo dentro de unos minutos.

Has calificado esta reseña.

Reportaste esta reseña

great listen

Total
5 out of 5 stars
Ejecución
5 out of 5 stars
Historia
5 out of 5 stars

Revisado: 03-28-23

for such a topic, he made it very interesting to listen. to. enough humor

Se ha producido un error. Vuelve a intentarlo dentro de unos minutos.

Has calificado esta reseña.

Reportaste esta reseña

Interesting, but no ending

Total
4 out of 5 stars
Ejecución
5 out of 5 stars
Historia
4 out of 5 stars

Revisado: 03-20-23

Echoing another reviewer, the story is at times confusing. The end of the 1st book doesn't seem to wrap up much, almost as if the book was split for length rather than reaching at least a partial conclusion.
I picked up the 1st book as part of Audible Plus, and will likely eventually pick up the rest of the series for Audible credits.

Se ha producido un error. Vuelve a intentarlo dentro de unos minutos.

Has calificado esta reseña.

Reportaste esta reseña

esto le resultó útil a 2 personas

letters idea

Total
5 out of 5 stars
Ejecución
5 out of 5 stars
Historia
5 out of 5 stars

Revisado: 03-06-23

Interesting way to write such a book. Fits in very well with what little I know of the period

Se ha producido un error. Vuelve a intentarlo dentro de unos minutos.

Has calificado esta reseña.

Reportaste esta reseña

dated

Total
3 out of 5 stars
Ejecución
5 out of 5 stars
Historia
3 out of 5 stars

Revisado: 02-16-22

moderately interesting but by 2022 it's dated material. in 2010 or so it would be more relevant

Se ha producido un error. Vuelve a intentarlo dentro de unos minutos.

Has calificado esta reseña.

Reportaste esta reseña

Dated ecology dystopia

Total
2 out of 5 stars
Ejecución
4 out of 5 stars
Historia
2 out of 5 stars

Revisado: 01-21-22

When the book was written in 1972, the setting made some sense in a very dystopian look at the world. The book hasn't aged well. Looking back, even in the late 1970s it hadn't aged well.
At best it helped stir the political will for enforcement and attitude changes to stop pollution.

Se ha producido un error. Vuelve a intentarlo dentro de unos minutos.

Has calificado esta reseña.

Reportaste esta reseña

poor scifi

Total
3 out of 5 stars
Ejecución
4 out of 5 stars
Historia
3 out of 5 stars

Revisado: 12-20-19

I found the characters unrealistic even for kids. They were to much the special savior with to many things only seeming to be there to try and save the story..
also the science part seemed poorly done. the drive is an standard acceptable trope as are the stasis pods. other parts seemed off as if the writer wasn't familiar with sci-fi or ships. The use of fore rather than bow was the most jarring. failure to do basic research.

Se ha producido un error. Vuelve a intentarlo dentro de unos minutos.

Has calificado esta reseña.

Reportaste esta reseña

adbl_web_global_use_to_activate_webcro805_stickypopup