OYENTE

Gretchenweiners

  • 6
  • opiniones
  • 0
  • votos útiles
  • 7
  • calificaciones

Excellent insights, will be returning multiple times

Total
5 out of 5 stars
Ejecución
5 out of 5 stars
Historia
5 out of 5 stars

Revisado: 03-04-25

It’s legitimately made a positive impact in my life and I haven’t even sat down and done the exercises yet, I’m saving that for my second time through. But already I’m seeing a positive difference in my life.

Sucks to find out this has been an audiobook since 2016 and just in print since 2012 and I could’ve just been living better this whole time, but I guess that’s the grief of lost time Dr. Burgo talks about.

Se ha producido un error. Vuelve a intentarlo dentro de unos minutos.

Has calificado esta reseña.

Reportaste esta reseña

Amazing format and story, one terribly frustrating narrator

Total
5 out of 5 stars
Ejecución
5 out of 5 stars
Historia
5 out of 5 stars

Revisado: 02-22-25

Potential spoiler

I understand why the dynamic between Lauren and Larkin was how it was, but holy smokes was I getting frustrated with Larkin. Assuming she read all of Lauren’s journals from Talents and at least some of her journals from Sower, how can she stand the level of cognitive dissonance it takes to keep on living with her uncle and thinking her mom is a bad person?

Se ha producido un error. Vuelve a intentarlo dentro de unos minutos.

Has calificado esta reseña.

Reportaste esta reseña

Groundwork then pay dirt

Total
5 out of 5 stars
Ejecución
5 out of 5 stars
Historia
5 out of 5 stars

Revisado: 01-02-25

Mr. Coates is brilliant at laying groundwork that lets you know where he’s going, but still leaves you surprised by the articulation of his final point.

He builds the narrative in a way that if you know the conflict in which he’s talking about, you know what he will ultimately say, but his courage to see it through to the end and stand on his beliefs is admirable. Especially when the views he stands on are ones he came to over time and ones that could very well leave him a pariah in the same highly esteemed circles he was once so lauded in.

It takes a real man (or person of conviction of any gender expression, in this instance, a man) to do what is right without fear of personal consequence. Salute Mr. Coates, excellent book. Highly recommend.

Se ha producido un error. Vuelve a intentarlo dentro de unos minutos.

Has calificado esta reseña.

Reportaste esta reseña

Masterpiece, would give 6 stars if I could

Total
5 out of 5 stars
Ejecución
5 out of 5 stars
Historia
5 out of 5 stars

Revisado: 01-01-25

First of all, this was my first venture into McCarthy. I maybe should have done some research beforehand on what not to start with, because this was truly diving into the deep end, but wow.

The way in which McCarthy writes this novel is so interesting - the way he describes the most mundane aspects of travel by horseback across the open country and then some the absolute most cruel and sadistic violence I’ve ever heard with the same air of neutrality is legitimately chilling. The way you can almost miss the fact that you’re reading about a massacre until it’s literally in the midst of happening, and then the swiftness and apathy of the way the story moves on really illustrates the completeness of the violence against the Indigenous people in the American west. So much was just erased forever, and you get that sense from how quickly and without reflection the characters and the story moves on from these actions.

And then of course we need to talk about the Judge. Is it bad that it actually took me a few of his scenes before I made up my mind whether he was evil or not? It goes beyond the immense glazing that Tobin did where he touted all the Judge’s great abilities to the Kid. He just has what the kids today would call “aura.”

My oh my how that changes as time goes on. Not the part about his charisma, but you definitely learn very quickly that the Judge is the worst of them all, tenfold as bad as even Glanton in my opinion. I’ve seen analysis now about how the Judge is supposedly the incarnation of the devil himself, and I can see why, but I’m not totally sold on that. The main reason is because of his interactions with the Kid, particularly in the end. I think the Judge shows a certain level of human weakness in the end when he kills the Kid, at that point in the story referred to as the Man.

I think the Judge kills the Man in the end because he was the only one who truly resisted the evil temptation the Judge seemed to represent and bring out of the rest of Glanton’s gang. The Judge corrupts or desecrates everything of innocence he comes in contact with, and although the Kid is undoubtedly involved in some measure of evil and cruelty being apart of their gang, he never fully gives himself over to the sadistic evil the Judge brings out of almost everyone else in the story besides the innocent children it is greatly implied he sexually assaults.

In the end, the Judge kills the Man because he has been defeated. He has been denied and cannot exercise influence over the Man, so he exercises the only influence he has left and extinguishes the life force that would not succumb to his temptation because he could not bend it to his will. And although he returns to his dancing in the end saying he will never die, the Man has forced him to do something we really never see him do otherwise - act rashly and emotionally. In this sense, I think the Man defeated him because he never truly gave over his soul - which is an interesting conclusion to make considering I think the emotional rashness is what makes him human, despite largely dealing in the corruption of souls, often canonized as the work of the devil. But then again he plays the fiddle too so who knows? Lol.

Fantastic book, probably my new favorite at least for right now. I’d give it 6 stars if I could.

Se ha producido un error. Vuelve a intentarlo dentro de unos minutos.

Has calificado esta reseña.

Reportaste esta reseña

A little dull, but a decent journey

Total
4 out of 5 stars
Ejecución
5 out of 5 stars
Historia
3 out of 5 stars

Revisado: 01-01-25

The “protagonist” if you’d like to call him that was a little bit grating as far as personality goes. He’s vaguely angry at everything, yet simultaneously at nothing in particular at all. It seems that in his mind, most of what he does is out of spite, yet it seems what he was really after was desperately seeking some sort of either father figure or spiritual savior to give him something to believe in - hence the obsession with the blind man. Although I found him annoying, fairly interesting main character especially when trying to assess motivations.

Se ha producido un error. Vuelve a intentarlo dentro de unos minutos.

Has calificado esta reseña.

Reportaste esta reseña

Beautiful, descriptive prose

Total
5 out of 5 stars
Ejecución
5 out of 5 stars
Historia
5 out of 5 stars

Revisado: 01-01-25

I was especially touched by the line from Alejandra’s aunt about cowardice.

“Long before morning I knew that what I was seeking to discover was a thing I’d always known. That all courage was a form of constancy. That it is always himself that the coward abandoned first. After this all betrayals come easily.”

That line will likely stay with me forever.

Se ha producido un error. Vuelve a intentarlo dentro de unos minutos.

Has calificado esta reseña.

Reportaste esta reseña

adbl_web_global_use_to_activate_webcro768_stickypopup