OYENTE

David

  • 52
  • opiniones
  • 104
  • votos útiles
  • 144
  • calificaciones

Best Book In Years on the Subject of Algorithms

Total
5 out of 5 stars
Ejecución
5 out of 5 stars
Historia
2 out of 5 stars

Revisado: 05-02-25

Perfectly enjoyable, highly informative, full of new details on stories I’d heard before but clearly did not know.

Se ha producido un error. Vuelve a intentarlo dentro de unos minutos.

Has calificado esta reseña.

Reportaste esta reseña

Some refreshing approaches to the understanding of the quantum world. Our world.

Total
5 out of 5 stars
Ejecución
5 out of 5 stars
Historia
1 out of 5 stars

Revisado: 04-18-25

I liked the treatment of the misguided Everettian view of Many Worlds: use it for the insights it gives while discarding its overall preposterousness.
Professor Ball: do it again please.

Se ha producido un error. Vuelve a intentarlo dentro de unos minutos.

Has calificado esta reseña.

Reportaste esta reseña

Constant Nagging Diatribe

Total
4 out of 5 stars
Ejecución
5 out of 5 stars
Historia
3 out of 5 stars

Revisado: 03-15-25

A genuine desire to improve education for both the recipients of that education and of the public in general pervades the book. However it only briefly touches on the actual need to transcend the Doctoral system that perpetuates the fawning and ass-kissing that the system enthrones that doesn’t lend itself to real creative thought and research. Far be it from a doctoral student to have ideas out of line with old professor fudnik or Doctor pambynamby.
The revision of that system to more of a meritocratic mean is key.

Se ha producido un error. Vuelve a intentarlo dentro de unos minutos.

Has calificado esta reseña.

Reportaste esta reseña

A great deal of Apostrophe on how History is done

Total
1 out of 5 stars
Ejecución
2 out of 5 stars
Historia
3 out of 5 stars

Revisado: 07-15-24

Debates on Imperial Britain’s management of India are a level of extrapolation too far from what the book should have been…analysis of historiography would be a better description than The Roman Empire

Se ha producido un error. Vuelve a intentarlo dentro de unos minutos.

Has calificado esta reseña.

Reportaste esta reseña

esto le resultó útil a 1 persona

Be prepared for poor narration

Total
5 out of 5 stars
Ejecución
2 out of 5 stars
Historia
2 out of 5 stars

Revisado: 05-15-24

Narrator does not know that kw is kilowatts GW gigawatts and so on. He reads them as k w and G W. it’s irritating. But the info is very worthwhile

Se ha producido un error. Vuelve a intentarlo dentro de unos minutos.

Has calificado esta reseña.

Reportaste esta reseña

Beautiful Prose - Poetic Exposition

Total
5 out of 5 stars
Ejecución
3 out of 5 stars
Historia
5 out of 5 stars

Revisado: 01-04-24

There is nothing at all to dislike in this, unless length be not a merit.

Se ha producido un error. Vuelve a intentarlo dentro de unos minutos.

Has calificado esta reseña.

Reportaste esta reseña

Pronunciation Can Distract from Topic

Total
5 out of 5 stars
Ejecución
2 out of 5 stars
Historia
4 out of 5 stars

Revisado: 11-26-23

This is a marvellous collection of thoughts and debates by the top minds in Physics. Superb. However one of the readers has an irritating way of pronouncing various key scientific words. I wonder if he was expeerimenting with the audience. Spearmint is a flavour- not a scientific paradigm.

Se ha producido un error. Vuelve a intentarlo dentro de unos minutos.

Has calificado esta reseña.

Reportaste esta reseña

Mixed Feelings

Total
4 out of 5 stars
Ejecución
5 out of 5 stars
Historia
3 out of 5 stars

Revisado: 11-02-23

Excellent, technically, in all respects. A very real and realist/realistic approach on a wide-ranging field of topics.
However Smil is clearly a cheerleader of the status quo. His overall message is “things will go about how they have always gone, because we humans change little in our foresight and ability to pre-plan.
I get the impression that, were he sent back in time to 1899 he would have little to say about the “over enthusiastic proponents of horseless carriages. Flying machines a ridiculous fantasy”.
Worthwhile all the same.

Se ha producido un error. Vuelve a intentarlo dentro de unos minutos.

Has calificado esta reseña.

Reportaste esta reseña

Big Headed Parochialism

Total
4 out of 5 stars
Ejecución
3 out of 5 stars
Historia
3 out of 5 stars

Revisado: 07-12-23

Don’t send music or art or philosophy to the aliens….send basic physics which they already know and learn in the nursery (if they even NEED to learn it). To send our “achievements” in science to a species thousands of years advanced beyond us would be silliness beyond belief.
Send something the aliens would really be interested by: “we have been searching here and here using these methods for this long and we only found YOU so far”.
You make yourself infinitely interesting and enjoyable by talking about the other person not yourself. :-)

Se ha producido un error. Vuelve a intentarlo dentro de unos minutos.

Has calificado esta reseña.

Reportaste esta reseña

Brilliant Explaining of Scientific Mis-Step

Total
4 out of 5 stars
Ejecución
5 out of 5 stars
Historia
2 out of 5 stars

Revisado: 12-20-22

But for the total unbelievability of the “many worlds” boondoggle of “science”, this is a well explained and even brilliant exposition.
But if you can wrap your arms around Many Worlds you may as well believe in unicorns and the power of crystals. It should be called many many many many many many many…worlds. Ridiculous.

Se ha producido un error. Vuelve a intentarlo dentro de unos minutos.

Has calificado esta reseña.

Reportaste esta reseña

adbl_web_global_use_to_activate_webcro805_stickypopup