Ana Kelly
- 1
- revisión
- 0
- votos útiles
- 68
- calificaciones
-
Worse than Nothing
- The Dangerous Fallacy of Originalism
- De: Erwin Chemerinsky
- Narrado por: Daniel Henning
- Duración: 7 h y 9 m
- Versión completa
-
General4.5 out of 5 stars 70
-
Narración:4.5 out of 5 stars 59
-
Historia4.5 out of 5 stars 58
Originalism, the view that the meaning of a constitutional provision is fixed when it is adopted, was once the fringe theory of a few extremely conservative legal scholars but is now a well-accepted mode of constitutional interpretation. Noted legal scholar Erwin Chemerinsky gives a comprehensive analysis of the problems that make originalism unworkable as a method of constitutional interpretation. He argues that the framers themselves never intended constitutional interpretation to be inflexible and shows how it is often impossible to know the "original intent" of any provision.
-
5 out of 5 stars
-
Impeccably Logical, Backed by 100 Specific Example
- De Amy Eaton en 03-17-23
- Worse than Nothing
- The Dangerous Fallacy of Originalism
- De: Erwin Chemerinsky
- Narrado por: Daniel Henning
As a lay person
Revisado: 08-27-23
I found it clear and understandable. A lot of complex and nuanced concepts presented that I’d never known much less considered presented in a way that I could follow and understand. Thank you to the author.
Se ha producido un error. Vuelve a intentarlo dentro de unos minutos.
Has calificado esta reseña.
Reportaste esta reseña