OYENTE

Tad

  • 33
  • opiniones
  • 44
  • votos útiles
  • 59
  • calificaciones

Thorough and humorous

Total
4 out of 5 stars
Ejecución
4 out of 5 stars
Historia
4 out of 5 stars

Revisado: 01-27-25

The author dives into the history of early Christianity and its variation as well as the conflicts that eventually defined the orthodoxy of Western Christianity, and does so with a subtle but profound sense of humor.

Se ha producido un error. Vuelve a intentarlo dentro de unos minutos.

Has calificado esta reseña.

Reportaste esta reseña

Timely & important, but not a bullseye

Total
3 out of 5 stars
Ejecución
5 out of 5 stars
Historia
3 out of 5 stars

Revisado: 12-15-24

E D Hirsh Jr makes a strong but not compelling case for returning to a “content based” primary and secondary education system. The reader will have to determine if the arguments are valid of if the author has mistaken correlation for causation. Worth the read and thought provoking.

Se ha producido un error. Vuelve a intentarlo dentro de unos minutos.

Has calificado esta reseña.

Reportaste esta reseña

Clear depiction of historical events

Total
5 out of 5 stars
Ejecución
5 out of 5 stars
Historia
5 out of 5 stars

Revisado: 10-10-24

Bannen’s narrative and Maddie’s performance pain a frightening picture of how Trum and the MAGA Republicans are trying to gaslight the entire country.

Se ha producido un error. Vuelve a intentarlo dentro de unos minutos.

Has calificado esta reseña.

Reportaste esta reseña

Appeal to the confirmation bias of theists; doesn’t prove the case

Total
3 out of 5 stars
Ejecución
4 out of 5 stars
Historia
1 out of 5 stars

Revisado: 09-12-24

Meyer starts with the assumption that God exists, then picks his evidence to support his case. His reasoning stands on a number of assumptions, and seem to imply that unanswered questions can only be answered by concluding that God exists.

His overall argument begs the question. Pieces of it commit other fallacies, and the end result is that he fails to move the needle for a critical review. But those who want to believe that a creator God intelligently designed the universe will find that it appeals to their confirmation bias.

There are to major problems with Meyer’s argument. The first is that a hypothetical God cannot be falsified. The second is that the very points that Meyer claims maturities science can’t answer apply to his argument as well, but at the God level. Where did Gid come from? How did that divine intelligence get its information? We must either hypothesize a creator for God, or we must accept the idea of something either existing eternally or came into existence spontaneously. Applying the same logic he uses to claim that a creator God is probable would force us to posit a super-God, and so on, an infinite regression. Occam’s razor implies that the hypothesis with the fewest entities is the most probable, defeating Meyer’s argument that the God hypothesis is the most probable.. and we are back to the inability to either prove or disprove the existence of deity.

Finally, even if we give Meyer’s argument credence, it can go no further. It does not shed any light on which religion, which tradition, or which denomination correctly identifies the creator God. We’re back to where Blaise Pascal was when he penned his famous wager.

Se ha producido un error. Vuelve a intentarlo dentro de unos minutos.

Has calificado esta reseña.

Reportaste esta reseña

Thought provoking ideas at the junction of science and philosophy

Total
4 out of 5 stars
Ejecución
4 out of 5 stars
Historia
3 out of 5 stars

Revisado: 08-20-24

The authors take the findings of quantum physics and come up with an idea with the potential to solve some of the great mysteries of human existence. The authors make a few errors in their discussion of the idea that the universe appears th have been designed, and oversimplify the “big bang” theory. These don’t negate the conclusions the authors make, wrong, but they do detract from their reasoning. That said their ideas here are very powerful and anyone wanting to consider the nature of reality or the creation of the universe.

Se ha producido un error. Vuelve a intentarlo dentro de unos minutos.

Has calificado esta reseña.

Reportaste esta reseña

A Must Read for anyone, right or left, concerned for our demicracy

Total
5 out of 5 stars
Ejecución
5 out of 5 stars
Historia
5 out of 5 stars

Revisado: 03-05-24

Ms Macquarie has written a balanced and well thought through treatise on how disinformation is tearing at the fabric of our society. Listen to it with an open mind.

Se ha producido un error. Vuelve a intentarlo dentro de unos minutos.

Has calificado esta reseña.

Reportaste esta reseña

Required Reading for anyone who cares about our Constitution

Total
5 out of 5 stars
Ejecución
4 out of 5 stars
Historia
5 out of 5 stars

Revisado: 07-07-23

We’ll research and supported narrative of the authoritarian political movement masquerading as Christian that seeks to put its leaders and members in a position of privilege over any who hold differing views,

Se ha producido un error. Vuelve a intentarlo dentro de unos minutos.

Has calificado esta reseña.

Reportaste esta reseña

Overtaken by new evidence

Total
4 out of 5 stars
Ejecución
5 out of 5 stars
Historia
4 out of 5 stars

Revisado: 10-16-22

This is an excellent piece of reporting, and a worthy listen, but new evidence revealed by the Select Committee, the Mar-a-lago documents case, and other sources leaves the work in need of revision.

Se ha producido un error. Vuelve a intentarlo dentro de unos minutos.

Has calificado esta reseña.

Reportaste esta reseña

An important record

Total
5 out of 5 stars
Ejecución
5 out of 5 stars
Historia
5 out of 5 stars

Revisado: 09-15-22

Herman’s version of events dealing with Trump and Barr attempting to manipulate justice. Important as history. Important as a cautionary tale.

Se ha producido un error. Vuelve a intentarlo dentro de unos minutos.

Has calificado esta reseña.

Reportaste esta reseña

A very needed work

Total
4 out of 5 stars
Ejecución
4 out of 5 stars
Historia
4 out of 5 stars

Revisado: 09-12-22

The ideas presented in this book are timely and critically needed in our world today. They are well presented for the most part. There is some irony with the placement of chapter 10 - an over-generalized discussion if “alternative@ vs “scientific” medicine that exemplifies “confirmation bias” - after chapter 9 - a discussion of confirmation and other biases.

The author also seems to expect that critical thinking will lead to globalism and overlooks opposing motives of political or commercial gain. Cf J Haight “The Righteous Mind”

The saddest reality here is that the audience most likely to benefit from this book is the one least likely to pick it up.

Se ha producido un error. Vuelve a intentarlo dentro de unos minutos.

Has calificado esta reseña.

Reportaste esta reseña

adbl_web_global_use_to_activate_T1_webcro805_stickypopup