sara snart

very accurate

Revisado: 01-11-25

the info was very accurate. being an old lady from Wisconsin I remember. but the town has changed. there is a given museum in Plainfield

Has calificado esta reseña.

Reportaste esta reseña

the bias of the authors. they had their individual made up before the trial

Revisado: 02-19-24

if you want to hear trash talk about defence lawyers this is for you. very biased against defence

Has calificado esta reseña.

Reportaste esta reseña

got many facts just wrong

Revisado: 09-21-22

I lived in Wisconsin near Plainfield. he got ed gien wrong in several places

Has calificado esta reseña.

Reportaste esta reseña

Want to return

Revisado: 02-15-22

I have tried to return this book and it says It is not ellagable for return. And then I spen over an hour clicking links trying to get to customer service to talk to someone with no luck. It is a non ending loop. Says use the chat option. There is no chat option. Thinking about canceling the sibscription because of no zero Mada customer service by the way the book sucks

Has calificado esta reseña.

Reportaste esta reseña

esto le resultó útil a 5 personas

it was an opinionated piece of crap

Revisado: 07-08-21

this guy is super opinionated and is not even willing to look at any alternatives. I havecread the waren report published for the general public and also several of the unpublished ones not released to the general public. thecwaren report is full of enormous holes. they needed someone to blame and a guy who lived in Russia for several years and had a Russian wife made a fantastic patsy. oh and he was murderers within just a couple days. and in November the tree he took his shot thru had leaves on it. he had a perfect shot before they turned the corner but he waited till he had a really tough obstructed shot. sorry I just don't believe he acted alone. he was not that good

Has calificado esta reseña.

Reportaste esta reseña

not very accurate

Revisado: 03-25-21

it had a lot of things that are just not correct. disappointing. going to return it

Has calificado esta reseña.

Reportaste esta reseña

written by one of his lawyers not unbiased view

Revisado: 01-16-21

while it had a lot of facts in it. it was horribly one sided. it made him sound like a horribly mentally ill man who was not responsible for his crimes. his crimes were very well planned. he had workers dig Graves under his house for future victims he intentionally went out trolling for young men who would not be missed. he had police at his house several times prior to Rob piest death. he spent a great deal of time covering his tracks. he knew exactly what he was doing. was he nuts absolutely but he knew what he was doing was wrong and took great steps to cover his tracks

Has calificado esta reseña.

Reportaste esta reseña