OYENTE

ghraspalt

  • 4
  • opiniones
  • 0
  • votos útiles
  • 13
  • calificaciones

Well researched and well presented in great detail

Total
5 out of 5 stars
Ejecución
4 out of 5 stars
Historia
4 out of 5 stars

Revisado: 05-07-23

I have read Shelby Foote's 3 volumes, I have listened to "American Ulysses" and Catton's "Grant Takes Command", but this short book covers a very short period of time at the point when Grant and his army forced the surrender of Lee and ultimately ended the Civil War. Catton's book is well done and researched, but this book because it covers a 16 day period is very detailed. I am not familiar with the author, but he seems to have a wealth of references to support his text and if he does not have the textual support he suggests that for some activity Lincoln might have done this or that given the circumstances. There appear to be many messages sent to Grant and Lincoln and from them to Washington to members of Lincoln's Cabinet. It seems as though all of those telegrams were preserved somewhere and the author searched them out. There is wealth of detail in this book that almost makes the reader/listener feel as though he was on the spot at the time. This is probably the best Civil War historical document I have come across. it is worth the reading or the listen.

Se ha producido un error. Vuelve a intentarlo dentro de unos minutos.

Has calificado esta reseña.

Reportaste esta reseña

It is Darwin presenting his most important work

Total
5 out of 5 stars
Ejecución
5 out of 5 stars
Historia
5 out of 5 stars

Revisado: 05-07-23

I did not read the book, I listened to the Audible version which was well done. I am not sure I would have finished the book if I tried to read it. There was way too much taxonomy and I am a chemist not a biologist. Listening to the book and I did listen carefully, I was impressed at the detail Darwin put into this book. It is not surprising that it took until 1859 before he felt he had everything in order so that he could publish. It is probably a good think that Wallace prodded Darwin enough that he had the courage to publish which at the time would have been condemned by the bible thumpers in the US of today. I don't think we give Darwin enough credit for the courage it took to do the research needed to support his work on Natural Selection. I my opinion Darwin is one of the most important scientists in human history. The work of Newton, Galileo, Einstein, Rutherford would have been done by someone else. There were and are plenty of hard science types around who would have come up with the discoveries of the physicists and mathematicians. Darwin was looking backwards in time and then postulating how prehistoric creatures would change and then ultimately change the world. It is not everyday that an intellect comes along who can synthesize what is gleaned from the past and project the path the future will take.

Se ha producido un error. Vuelve a intentarlo dentro de unos minutos.

Has calificado esta reseña.

Reportaste esta reseña

I didn't learn much new, but it was well presented

Total
4 out of 5 stars
Ejecución
5 out of 5 stars
Historia
5 out of 5 stars

Revisado: 05-01-22

Having read and viewed much about the Civil War I did not expect to learn much that was new. I did want to get a viewpoint of an academic on the subject. Generally, I think the content was objectively presented. The most new information for me was the detailed information on how the two armies were organized from the top down to regional commanders and then to the commanders of smaller geographical regions and then to the the different corps. Understanding the organizational structure helped me to keep the various campaigns straight. I also think Gallagher did a good job of presenting not juist the military part of the war but also provided the political context as well as the impacts on the people left at home to try and keep their societies intact. The discussions of possible efforts to get recognition by the South as a separate country was something I knew about, but the presenter fleshed out this effort as it seemed to be a continuing effort until 1864 when the fortunes of the South were becoming more hopeless. In general I am pleased that I took the effort to listen to this series.

Se ha producido un error. Vuelve a intentarlo dentro de unos minutos.

Has calificado esta reseña.

Reportaste esta reseña

I rated book 4 stars ("It's great")because it is

Total
4 out of 5 stars
Ejecución
5 out of 5 stars
Historia
4 out of 5 stars

Revisado: 06-29-21

I generally listen to these books on Audible, I have plenty of other research work to read and listening to the Rutledge books is relaxing. I was not sure to purchase this title given the several negative reviews and complaints about an abrupt ending without tie up the loose ends. I listened to the book, a bit perplexed by the identity of the real culprit and then went back and listened to the book again knowing the answer and listening for comments made by the murderer. When you know the answer then the innocuous sounding comments take on a new interpretation because the guilty person is trying to thread the needle of seeming to be one of the good guys and yet trying to figure out what Rutledge knows or thinks he knows. I won't mention characters' names because I don't want to spoil the book for others, but I will say that when you have finished the book go back to somewhere around chapter 10 or 11 and read the rest of the book again. I think you will find it a different read from the first time. One aspect the Todd duality is that they are true to their creation. Rutledge is befuddled, misled, misdirected, and it takes him some time to finally appreciate that the genesis of the crime he is currently investigating lay in the past. He needs to spin his (mental) wheels until with dogged determination the subtle clues drop into place and he has the answer. Some reviewers complain about the amount of driving around Rutledge does but Britain isn't all that large and after all the setting is 1920 ± 1 or 2 years. It isn't like driving there today. The other factor that takes getting accustomed to is the difficulty of communication. Phones are not easily accessed, there is no email so driving back to London to personally take care of things is reasonable. Rutledge, while quite competent and tenacious still has to dig out facts one at a time and also deal with the misleading and outright obstruction of the people from who he must extract information.

Se ha producido un error. Vuelve a intentarlo dentro de unos minutos.

Has calificado esta reseña.

Reportaste esta reseña

adbl_web_global_use_to_activate_webcro805_stickypopup