Bloodstone Audiolibro Por Paul Doherty arte de portada

Bloodstone

Vista previa
Prueba por $0.00
Prime logotipo Exclusivo para miembros Prime: ¿Nuevo en Audible? Obtén 2 audiolibros gratis con tu prueba.
Elige 1 audiolibro al mes de nuestra inigualable colección.
Escucha todo lo que quieras de entre miles de audiolibros, Originals y podcasts incluidos.
Accede a ofertas y descuentos exclusivos.
Premium Plus se renueva automáticamente por $14.95 al mes después de 30 días. Cancela en cualquier momento.

Bloodstone

De: Paul Doherty
Narrado por: Terry Wale
Prueba por $0.00

$14.95 al mes después de 30 días. Cancela en cualquier momento.

Compra ahora por $18.65

Compra ahora por $18.65

Confirma la compra
la tarjeta con terminación
Al confirmar tu compra, aceptas las Condiciones de Uso de Audible y el Aviso de Privacidad de Amazon. Impuestos a cobrar según aplique.
Cancelar

Acerca de esta escucha

December, 1380. When the corpse of Sir Robert Kilverby is discovered in a locked room, Brother Athelstan accompanies the King’s coronor to investigate. For the late Sir Robert had in his possession a sacred bloodstone which he was planning to donate to the Abbey of St Fulcher-on-Thames.

The bloodstone has disappeared and the Regent is taking an uncomfortably close interest in the case. Athelstan is sceptical of rumours of a curse hanging over Kilverby and his comrades of the Wyvern Company. But then it is discovered that a second old soldier has been slain on the same night. As Athelstan begins to uncover the dark secrets surrounding the Abbey of St Fulcher, the bloodstone curse seems all too real.

©2012 Paul Doherty (P)2012 Soundings
Histórico Misterio Ficción
adbl_web_global_use_to_activate_T1_webcro805_stickypopup
Todas las estrellas
Más relevante  
If you’re just here for the medieval atmosphere (rugged, muddy and bloody style at least), then go ahead.

If you want a mystery, look elsewhere.

It’s one of those where the solution is that some barely relevant character “dunnit” for a motive in the form of a stagnant character trait. It starts with one group of characters, sets up a list of cliche motives with them, then spends about 70% of the novel with a completely different group of characters (and more grisly deaths than it really needs) before going back and saying “actually it was someone in the first group”.

I’m just not a fan of mysteries where the uninvolved person “dunnit”. It’s the easy way out.

Pointless

Se ha producido un error. Vuelve a intentarlo dentro de unos minutos.