
In Defense of Troublemakers
The Power of Dissent in Life and Business
No se pudo agregar al carrito
Add to Cart failed.
Error al Agregar a Lista de Deseos.
Error al eliminar de la lista de deseos.
Error al añadir a tu biblioteca
Error al seguir el podcast
Error al dejar de seguir el podcast
3 meses gratis
Compra ahora por $20.00
No default payment method selected.
We are sorry. We are not allowed to sell this product with the selected payment method
-
Narrado por:
-
Joyce Bean
-
De:
-
Charlan Nemeth
An eminent psychologist explains why dissent should be cherished, not feared
We've decided by consensus that consensus is good. In In Defense of Troublemakers, psychologist Charlan Nemeth argues that this principle is completely wrong: left unchallenged, the majority opinion is often biased, unoriginal, or false. It leads planes and markets to crash, causes juries to convict innocent people, and can quite literally make people think blue is green. In the name of comity, we embrace stupidity. We can make better decisions by embracing dissent. Dissent forces us to question the status quo, consider more information, and engage in creative decision-making.
From Twelve Angry Men to Edward Snowden, lone objectors who make people question their assumptions bring groups far closer to truth - regardless of whether they are right or wrong. Essential listening for anyone who works in groups, In Defense of Troublemakers will radically change the way you think, listen, and make decisions.
©2018 Charlan Nemeth. (P)2018 Brilliance Publishing, Inc., all rights reserved.Listeners also enjoyed...




















Las personas que vieron esto también vieron:


















Interesting ideas, too long
Se ha producido un error. Vuelve a intentarlo dentro de unos minutos.
A Good Review of Group Thinking
Se ha producido un error. Vuelve a intentarlo dentro de unos minutos.
Outstanding! a must read for anyone who is breath
Se ha producido un error. Vuelve a intentarlo dentro de unos minutos.
While we will all agree with some of her points, we already know this and don't need the negativism she presents. Why make an argument by discrediting everything others have done? She has gone to greater lengths to discredit others than to present us with a valid idea or solution. Reading this is akin to watching Fox News or CNN during the Trump administration... someone angrily screaming about nothing all day, but not proposing solutions.
Entirely meh.
Se ha producido un error. Vuelve a intentarlo dentro de unos minutos.