The Gandhi Fraud Audiolibro Por Mark Libowitz arte de portada

The Gandhi Fraud

 Muestra de Voz Virtual
Prueba por $0.00
Escucha audiolibros, podcasts y Audible Originals con Audible Plus por un precio mensual bajo.
Escucha en cualquier momento y en cualquier lugar en tus dispositivos con la aplicación gratuita Audible.
Los suscriptores por primera vez de Audible Plus obtienen su primer mes gratis. Cancela la suscripción en cualquier momento.

The Gandhi Fraud

De: Mark Libowitz
Narrado por: Virtual Voice
Prueba por $0.00

Escucha con la prueba gratis de Plus

Compra ahora por $3.99

Compra ahora por $3.99

Confirma la compra
la tarjeta con terminación
Cambiar método de pago
Al confirmar tu compra, aceptas las Condiciones de Uso de Audible y el Aviso de Privacidad de Amazon. Impuestos a cobrar según aplique.
Cancelar
Background images

Este título utiliza narración de voz virtual

Voz Virtual es una narración generada por computadora para audiolibros..

Acerca de esta escucha

 This book is an analysis of Gandhi, what he preached, and the fundamental flaw underlying his hope for India and criticism of Britain. Let's be clear Gandhi preached peace and tolerance, which are stated in the Vedas and practiced by 80% of the population in India as they are part of being Hindu. Gandhi's fatal flaw was that he had forgotten the history of the region and underestimated the importance of religion to his people and other tribes in the region. He was assassinated by Nathuram Godse and a group of other Hindu fundamentalists who remained proud of the act and felt it was justified until their deaths, especially Gopal Godse. The British conducted the first census of the region and were correct in dividing British India into separate states as a result of their work and understanding of religious practices and the history of the region. Gandhi's fatal flaw was that what he was preaching contradicted Hindu law or dharma, which has little to do with the Vedas and is a manipulation of scripture by men to subjugate others. The Vedas and requirements of Hindus are amazing and good practices, but the interpretation of them and consequent Hindu law is filled with philosophical mistakes. Hindu law cripples India today, and Gandhi should have been expressing this; he either knew it in his heart of hearts or was a Hindu fundamentalist who set out to deceive the world. If it was the latter, then he, himself, would have understood that his assassination had to happen. If it was against Hindu law, he should have openly expressed that it was flawed and used this for the justification of his behavior. Gandhi played a huge role in getting the British removed from India, but he made a fatal flaw in that he misunderstood his people and the people represented as both majority and minority groups in India and neighboring nations today. India could be so much more, and many of the misinterpretations of the Vedas that have become Hindu law have led to poverty, lack of upward mobility, discrimination, genocide, disease, famine and much more. Indians are extremely intelligent people, and it perplexes the world how such intelligent people have repeatedly made so many poor social decisions that have led to dire circumstances for such a large population, which is guided indirectly by religious fundamentalism and in the soft underbelly of the caste system in a state that has bastardized secularism and democracy to date.
 Ciencia Política Política y Gobierno
adbl_web_global_use_to_activate_T1_webcro805_stickypopup
Todas las estrellas
Más relevante  
It's obvious this author promotes stereotypes. It's more of an anti modi, pro colonialism rant. The author forgets that india represented more than 25% of global GDP prior to the British Rule, and 2.5% at the end of its rule. India was prevented from participation in the industrial age to promote British industrialization. The 171 famines during British rule is more than the total number of famines prior to the british, and since the British left, there has not been a single famine, despite the population growing 3x. As for cast, the author is either ignorant or chooses to ignore the criminal tribes act enacted by the British that condemned 250 million Indians to convict status, and ripe for indentured slavery in the empire, and ignores the British aristocratic cast system. The author seems to have judged the carnage that the British left in india after looting all it could get to promote it's wars of self righteous greed and then associated the entire history of the subcontinent to this stereotype. Worthless and nothing to do with Gandhi other than click bait. And as for what's left of the British empire today - It has become a stain in the history books, with all but a few rocks off the coast of Argentina choosing to remain in the great Empire

Complete fiction

Se ha producido un error. Vuelve a intentarlo dentro de unos minutos.