
What Is Real?
The Unfinished Quest for the Meaning of Quantum Physics
No se pudo agregar al carrito
Add to Cart failed.
Error al Agregar a Lista de Deseos.
Error al eliminar de la lista de deseos.
Error al añadir a tu biblioteca
Error al seguir el podcast
Error al dejar de seguir el podcast
3 meses gratis
Compra ahora por $25.19
No default payment method selected.
We are sorry. We are not allowed to sell this product with the selected payment method
-
Narrado por:
-
Greg Tremblay
-
De:
-
Adam Becker
"A thorough, illuminating exploration of the most consequential controversy raging in modern science."—New York Times Book Review
An Editor's Choice, New York Times Book Review
Longlisted for PEN/E.O. Wilson Prize for Literary Science Writing
Longlisted for Goodreads Choice Award
Every physicist agrees quantum mechanics is among humanity's finest scientific achievements. But ask what it means, and the result will be a brawl. For a century, most physicists have followed Niels Bohr's solipsistic and poorly reasoned Copenhagen interpretation. Indeed, questioning it has long meant professional ruin, yet some daring physicists, such as John Bell, David Bohm, and Hugh Everett, persisted in seeking the true meaning of quantum mechanics. What Is Real? is the gripping story of this battle of ideas and the courageous scientists who dared to stand up for truth.
"An excellent, accessible account."—Wall Street Journal
"Splendid. . . . Deeply detailed research, accompanied by charming anecdotes about the scientists."—Washington Post
©2018 Adam Becker (P)2025 Basic BooksListeners also enjoyed...






Reseñas de la Crítica
"Becker's book is one of the first attempts we have at telling this story in a way that acknowledges how it actually turned out—acknowledges, that is, who won these debates about the Copenhagen interpretation, who lost them, who pretended otherwise, and how they got away with it.... He has clearly done extensive and meticulous historical research."—David Z. Albert, New York Review of Books
Las personas que vieron esto también vieron:


















The author makes the point (when discussing the untestable multi-universes theory) that no theory is really falsifiable. That is true, but misses the point. Such theories are not subject to Bayesian refinement necessary for advancement of science. The author suggests that Ptolemy’s (Earth centric) model gave the same results as Copernicus’s (Sun centric) model, and the difference was just in perspective. Of course, Ptolemy’s model was falsifiable and subject to Bayesian refinement (stars make tiny ellipses each year).
I do agree with the author’s final summary, (which John Bell made clear), that modern physicists should understand many of the possible frameworks for QM (particularly Bohmian mechanics). For me it seems believing in a Multi-Universe theory is similar believing in a religion. It is good to understand, but it is not scientific.
The best part of the book is the appendix with four interpretations of a delayed choice QM experiment.
The narration is clear and well produced.
Does not Deliver
Se ha producido un error. Vuelve a intentarlo dentro de unos minutos.