Was this the beginning of the end of stare decisis? Join host Gwendolyn Lindsay Cooley and New York Assistant Attorneys General Bob Hubbard and Isabella Pitt for a discussion about the game-changing Leegin RPM decision.

How do we know what makes an antitrust case, a criminal antitrust case? US Gypsum lays out the standard and makes us grateful for air conditioning. Join host Gwendolyn Lindsay Cooley and guests Kevin Hart and Jimmy Attridge as they cheerfully discuss this important criminal antitrust case.

Host Gwendolyn Lindsay Cooley is joined by Debbie Feinstein of Arnold and Porter to discuss this important DC Court of Appeals case that articulates the burden-shifting framework. You can read it for yourself in US v. Baker Hughes, 908 F.2d 981 (1990).

Why is an old RPM case a case you need to know? Join host Gwendolyn Lindsay Cooley and Stacie Lambert DeBlieux for a tete a tete about meetings of the mind.

You’ve read the Amex decision, and now let us help you try to understand it. Join host Gwendolyn Lindsay Cooley and guests Florida Assistant Attorney General Chris Knight and David B. Schwartz of Bryan Cave Leighton Paisner LLP discuss what is accepted and what is controversial about this Supreme Court decision on two-sided markets.

What is the difference between harm to competition and harm to a competitor? In Brunswick v. Pueblo Bowl-O-Mat, 429 US 477 (1977), the Court gives us an answer. Join host Gwendolyn Lindsay Cooley and University of Wisconsin Law Students Erin Lyman and Steven Meyer as they discuss Brunswick’s rollup and whether Pueblo Bowl O Mat can get damages for its competitor keeping bowling alleys on the market.

This foundational case is a state antitrust practice basic: why States plead things the way they do. Host Gwendolyn Lindsay Cooley is joined by Quinnipiac School of Law students Rose Levine and Benjamin Milano to discuss harm to a state’s general economy and what that does for proving standing and injury.

News Flash: Courts do not always agree. Two courts, the Maryland District Court and the Third Circuit were presented with the same facts and came to opposite legal conclusions. Join host Gwendolyn Lindsay Cooley and Maryland AAG Byron Warren as they unpick the facts and law of the parallel pricing allegations on summary judgment in two courts: In re Titanium Dioxide (D. Maryland) and Valspar v. EI Dupont de Nemours (3d Cir.).