Episodios

  • Diddy And The Billionaires Club

    Diddy And The Billionaires Club
    May 22 2025
    Elite billionaires often utilize their wealth and influence to shield themselves from accusations of crimes, leveraging their resources to manipulate legal systems, media narratives, and public opinion. These tactics can include hiring high-powered legal teams to intimidate accusers, settling cases out of court with non-disclosure agreements to silence victims, or employing private investigators to dig up dirt on those who speak out against them.

    Additionally, these billionaires often surround themselves with wealthy and influential friends who act as enablers, providing support and protection in various forms. This network of connections can be instrumental in suppressing allegations, exerting pressure on whistleblowers, or even influencing law enforcement and judicial processes.

    Furthermore, the immense financial resources at their disposal afford them access to top-tier lawyers, lobbyists, and public relations experts who specialize in managing and minimizing damage to their reputations. This combination of wealth, power, and influence creates significant barriers for accusers seeking justice and perpetuates a cycle of impunity among the elite.

    In essence, elite billionaires utilize their wealth and power not only to evade accountability for their actions but also to actively thwart efforts to hold them responsible, with the assistance of their well-connected allies and enablers.

    In this episode, we get a look at the Rogue's gallery that was enabling Diddy and financing his many different projects.



    (commercial at 10:56)

    to contact me:

    bobbycapucci@protonmail.com


    source:

    Secrets of Sean Diddy Combs' billionaire boys club (nypost.com)
    Más Menos
    16 m
  • Drew "Druski" Desbordes Looks To Sanction Ashley Parham For Her Diddy Related Allegations (Part 2) (5/22/25)

    Drew "Druski" Desbordes Looks To Sanction Ashley Parham For Her Diddy Related Allegations (Part 2) (5/22/25)
    May 22 2025
    Comedian Druski (Drew Desbordes) has filed a motion in a California federal court seeking sanctions against Ashley Parham and her attorneys, Ariel Mitchell and Shawn Perez, over allegations linking him to a 2018 sexual assault incident involving Sean "Diddy" Combs. Druski's legal team contends that Parham's claims are "provably false," highlighting inconsistencies in her statements and asserting that she previously identified different individuals as her assailants for the same date and location. The motion includes evidence such as a 2019 police report and a 2018 email in which Parham accused other men, not Druski, of the assault. Druski also provided documentation indicating he was in Georgia at the time of the alleged incident, not in California as claimed by Parham.

    In his motion, Druski argues that Parham's attorneys failed to conduct due diligence before filing the lawsuit, thereby causing reputational harm and unnecessary legal expenses. He seeks to have the court impose sanctions to cover his attorney fees and other related costs. Druski has publicly denied the allegations, stating that in 2018 he was not a public figure and lacked connections to the entertainment industry, making the claims against him implausible. He emphasizes his confidence that the evidence will exonerate him and expose the allegations as falsehoods.


    to contact me:


    bobbycapucci@protonmail.com


    source:

    Microsoft Word - 2025-04-07 - Motion for Rule 11 Sanctions(241103499.5).docx
    Más Menos
    14 m
  • Drew "Druski" Desbordes Looks To Sanction Ashley Parham For Her Diddy Related Allegations (Part 1) (5/22/25)

    Drew "Druski" Desbordes Looks To Sanction Ashley Parham For Her Diddy Related Allegations (Part 1) (5/22/25)
    May 22 2025
    Comedian Druski (Drew Desbordes) has filed a motion in a California federal court seeking sanctions against Ashley Parham and her attorneys, Ariel Mitchell and Shawn Perez, over allegations linking him to a 2018 sexual assault incident involving Sean "Diddy" Combs. Druski's legal team contends that Parham's claims are "provably false," highlighting inconsistencies in her statements and asserting that she previously identified different individuals as her assailants for the same date and location. The motion includes evidence such as a 2019 police report and a 2018 email in which Parham accused other men, not Druski, of the assault. Druski also provided documentation indicating he was in Georgia at the time of the alleged incident, not in California as claimed by Parham.

    In his motion, Druski argues that Parham's attorneys failed to conduct due diligence before filing the lawsuit, thereby causing reputational harm and unnecessary legal expenses. He seeks to have the court impose sanctions to cover his attorney fees and other related costs. Druski has publicly denied the allegations, stating that in 2018 he was not a public figure and lacked connections to the entertainment industry, making the claims against him implausible. He emphasizes his confidence that the evidence will exonerate him and expose the allegations as falsehoods.


    to contact me:


    bobbycapucci@protonmail.com


    source:

    Microsoft Word - 2025-04-07 - Motion for Rule 11 Sanctions(241103499.5).docx
    Más Menos
    13 m
  • The Diddy Trial: Former Diddy Assistant George Kaplan Takes The Stand On Day 8 (Part 2) (5/22/25)

    The Diddy Trial: Former Diddy Assistant George Kaplan Takes The Stand On Day 8 (Part 2) (5/22/25)
    May 22 2025
    On Day 8 of Sean "Diddy" Combs' federal sex trafficking and racketeering trial, former executive assistant George Kaplan provided detailed testimony about his tenure with Combs from 2013 to 2015. Kaplan described working extensive hours, often between 80 to 100 per week, and performing tasks that extended beyond typical assistant duties. He was responsible for booking hotel rooms under the alias "Frank Black," a nod to the late rapper Notorious B.I.G., and preparing them with specific items such as candles, baby oil, Astroglide, and liquor. Kaplan also testified that he procured drugs like MDMA and ketamine for Combs, sometimes using a corporate card, and maintained a kit containing various pills, including Advil and ketamine. He emphasized that these preparations were aimed at protecting Combs' public image, as hotels might sell compromising photos or videos of celebrities.

    Kaplan further recounted instances where he cleaned up hotel rooms after Combs' alleged "freak-off" sex parties, disposing of items like empty alcohol bottles, baby oil, and drugs, and tidying pillows to make it appear as if nothing had occurred. He mentioned encountering a brown crystallized powder in a bathroom during one cleanup. Kaplan testified that Combs frequently threatened his job, sometimes over minor issues, such as purchasing the wrong type of water bottles. He also stated that he left his position after witnessing Combs physically abuse his then-girlfriend, Cassie Ventura. Kaplan's testimony provides insight into the alleged operations within Combs' inner circle and supports the prosecution's narrative of a pattern of coercion and abuse.


    to contact me:


    bobbycapucci@protonmail.com



    source:

    May 21, 2025 - Day 8 of testimony in the Sean ‘Diddy’ Combs trial | CNN
    Más Menos
    16 m
  • The Diddy Trial: Gerard Gannon And Dawn Hughes Take The Stand On Day 8 (Part 1) (5/22/25)

    The Diddy Trial: Gerard Gannon And Dawn Hughes Take The Stand On Day 8 (Part 1) (5/22/25)
    May 22 2025
    On Day 8 of Sean "Diddy" Combs' federal sex trafficking and racketeering trial, the courtroom heard critical testimonies from a forensic psychologist and a former executive assistant, shedding light on the alleged abusive dynamics within Combs' personal and professional life. Forensic psychologist Dr. Dawn Hughes testified about the psychological patterns commonly observed in abusive relationships, such as trauma bonding and victim behavior, without directly referencing Combs or specific accusers. Despite the defense's attempts to portray her as biased, Hughes maintained her neutrality and emphasized the complexities victims face in abusive situations. Her insights aimed to provide context to the behaviors and decisions of individuals involved in such relationships.


    to contact me:

    bobbycapucci@protonmail.com



    source:

    May 21, 2025 - Day 8 of testimony in the Sean ‘Diddy’ Combs trial | CNN
    Más Menos
    23 m
  • Aubrey O'Day Announces That She Won't Be Called Upon To Testify As A Witness At The Diddy Trial (5/22/25)

    Aubrey O'Day Announces That She Won't Be Called Upon To Testify As A Witness At The Diddy Trial (5/22/25)
    May 22 2025
    Aubrey O'Day, former member of Danity Kane and protégé of Sean "Diddy" Combs, has confirmed she will not testify in Combs' ongoing federal sex-trafficking and racketeering trial. Despite speculation fueled by her recent Instagram post from New York City, where the trial is taking place, O'Day clarified on the premiere episode of her iHeartRadio podcast, Amy Robach & T.J. Holmes Present: Aubrey O'Day, Covering the Diddy Trial, that she has not been subpoenaed and does not plan to take the stand. She acknowledged being contacted by Homeland Security and attending a meeting with them regarding the case but emphasized that her presence in New York was unrelated to the trial proceedings


    O'Day has been vocal about her past experiences with Combs, alleging manipulative behavior during her time in Danity Kane, including claims of grooming and coercion. While she will not be testifying, O'Day continues to share her perspective on the trial through her podcast, offering commentary on the proceedings and expressing support for other accusers who have come forward. She described the trial as "bittersweet," noting that she has been speaking out about Combs for years and hopes the case brings about systemic change in the music industry .


    to contact me:


    bobbycapucci@protonmail.com




    source:

    Aubrey O'Day says she won't be testifying at Diddy trial | Fox News
    Más Menos
    12 m
  • Murder In Moscow: Will Judge Hippler Sanction The Prosecution Due To The Leaks? (5/21/25)

    Murder In Moscow: Will Judge Hippler Sanction The Prosecution Due To The Leaks? (5/21/25)
    May 22 2025
    In the ongoing trial of Bryan Kohberger, accused of the 2022 murders of four University of Idaho students, a significant development has arisen concerning unauthorized information leaks. Judge Steven Hippler has ordered an investigation into potential violations of a gag order after confidential case details, including Kohberger's internet search history and cellphone data, were aired in a May 9 episode of NBC's "Dateline" . The judge has mandated that both prosecution and defense teams submit lists of individuals who had access to the leaked information, encompassing staff, law enforcement, and consultants. He also indicated a willingness to appoint a special prosecutor to identify the source of the leak .

    The implications of these leaks are profound. Legal experts suggest that if the leaked information is deemed to have compromised the fairness of the trial, it could lead to the exclusion of critical evidence, such as surveillance footage and cellphone records, which are pivotal to the prosecution's case . Such exclusions could hinder the prosecution's ability to establish Kohberger's presence at the crime scene. Furthermore, the leaks may complicate jury selection by affecting potential jurors' impartiality, potentially prolonging the trial and increasing costs. Judge Hippler emphasized the necessity of identifying and holding accountable those responsible for the leaks to uphold the integrity of the judicial process .


    to contact me:


    bobbycapucci@protonmail.com



    source:

    Idaho judge may exclude leaked Bryan Kohberger murder evidence from trial: Expert | Fox News
    Más Menos
    13 m
  • Mega Edition: 'Celebrity Basketball Jane Doe Has Her Motion For Anonymity Denied (5/22/25)

    Mega Edition: 'Celebrity Basketball Jane Doe Has Her Motion For Anonymity Denied (5/22/25)
    May 22 2025
    ​In the case of Jane Doe v. Sean Combs, the plaintiff, Jane Doe, filed a lawsuit against Sean Combs and associated entities, alleging that Combs sexually assaulted her at a charity event he co-sponsored in 1991. The plaintiff sought to proceed anonymously, citing the sensitive nature of the allegations and potential harm if her identity were disclosed. Initially, the court granted a temporary order allowing her to proceed under a pseudonym, pending further review.

    Upon subsequent evaluation, the court applied the ten-factor balancing test from Sealed Plaintiff v. Sealed Defendant to determine whether the plaintiff could continue anonymously. The court found that while the case involved sensitive personal matters, other factors—such as the significant public interest in the proceedings, potential prejudice to the defendants, and the plaintiff's ability to present her case without anonymity—outweighed the arguments for anonymity. Consequently, the court denied the plaintiff's motion to proceed under a pseudonym, emphasizing the importance of transparency and public access in judicial proceedings.


    to contact me:

    bobbycapucci@protonmail.com


    source:

    gov.uscourts.nysd.633975.44.0.pdf
    Más Menos
    25 m
adbl_web_global_use_to_activate_T1_webcro805_stickypopup