
Is Women’s Lacrosse Outdated?
No se pudo agregar al carrito
Solo puedes tener X títulos en el carrito para realizar el pago.
Add to Cart failed.
Por favor prueba de nuevo más tarde
Error al Agregar a Lista de Deseos.
Por favor prueba de nuevo más tarde
Error al eliminar de la lista de deseos.
Por favor prueba de nuevo más tarde
Error al añadir a tu biblioteca
Por favor intenta de nuevo
Error al seguir el podcast
Intenta nuevamente
Error al dejar de seguir el podcast
Intenta nuevamente
-
Narrado por:
-
De:
Acerca de esta escucha
Why are we still playing two different versions of lacrosse?
In this episode, we ask the tough question: Should women’s lacrosse evolve to use the same rules, pads, and contact as the men’s game? From concussion statistics and equipment differences to the rise of women’s box lacrosse and elite athletes like Jamie Ortega, we dive deep into why the current divide may be holding the sport back.
We explore:
- The outdated origins of women’s lacrosse (1931 rules vs. modern athletes)
- How female performance in track and swimming proves they’re ready for more
- Why “non-contact” doesn’t mean “no injuries” — especially in women’s lax
- What wrestling, rugby, and lacrosse sixes can teach us about unification
- How girls’ participation grows the entire sport (just ask high school wrestling)
If you love lacrosse, care about safety, and believe in giving all athletes the same opportunity to compete—this is the episode you don’t want to miss.
📣 Join the conversation @Crewzintothevoid and let us know: Should we stop separating the rules and just call it what it is—lacrosse?
adbl_web_global_use_to_activate_T1_webcro805_stickypopup
Todavía no hay opiniones