
Judge Upholds Order to Preserve ChatGPT Conversations in Copyright Lawsuit
No se pudo agregar al carrito
Add to Cart failed.
Error al Agregar a Lista de Deseos.
Error al eliminar de la lista de deseos.
Error al añadir a tu biblioteca
Error al seguir el podcast
Error al dejar de seguir el podcast
-
Narrado por:
-
De:
Acerca de esta escucha
In a high-stakes copyright lawsuit, Judge Ona Wong upheld an earlier order requiring the preservation of all ChatGPT conversations for evidence. This decision stems from a lawsuit by the New York Times against OpenAI and Microsoft over alleged copyright infringement. The ruling has sparked concerns among users like Aiden Hunt, who worry that their private and sensitive conversations with ChatGPT could become part of legal proceedings. Hunt, unaware of the potential for his chats to be used as evidence, fears for the dissemination of personal and commercial information. OpenAI argues that the order undermines its privacy promises, as it forces the company to retain even deleted chats, contradicting its policy of removing such content within 30 days. Despite these concerns, Judge Wong stood firm, dismissing Hunt's constitutional arguments.
00:00 Introduction to the High-Stakes Copyright Lawsuit
00:48 Judge's Order to Preserve ChatGPT Conversations
01:11 Concerns Over Privacy and Litigation Evidence
01:45 Impact on OpenAI's Privacy Policies
02:04 Judge's Dismissal of Constitutional Concerns