
Matthew Cobb - Why Neuroscience Still Can’t Explain Much
No se pudo agregar al carrito
Solo puedes tener X títulos en el carrito para realizar el pago.
Add to Cart failed.
Por favor prueba de nuevo más tarde
Error al Agregar a Lista de Deseos.
Por favor prueba de nuevo más tarde
Error al eliminar de la lista de deseos.
Por favor prueba de nuevo más tarde
Error al añadir a tu biblioteca
Por favor intenta de nuevo
Error al seguir el podcast
Intenta nuevamente
Error al dejar de seguir el podcast
Intenta nuevamente
-
Narrado por:
-
De:
Acerca de esta escucha
Despite multi-million dollar research programmes and impressive technical progress, neuroscience still can’t explain basic systems - like a maggot’s tiny brain or the grinding of a lobster’s stomach.
Professor Matthew Cobb joins me to discuss the intellectual history of neuroscience, his frank assessment of where we’re at, and how we can make progress.
We cover:
- How the idea of the brain as computer got started in the mid-C20th, and why it’s probably wrong. (10:53)
- The challenge of the Grandmother Cell - and why some neurons selectively respond to Jennifer Aniston and Halle Berry! (21:00)
- What have we really learnt from fMRI? Is it “just a bit crap”? (27:25)
- Why the Human Brain Project was so controversial - and how its has spectacularly failed to live up to its own rhetoric (36:29).
- Could a neuroscientists understand a microprocessor? We discuss the brilliant study by Eric Jonas and Konrad Paul Kording. (41:30)
- The amazing achievement of artificial limbs (49:50)
- How useful is the ‘predictive brain theory’ favoured by Anil Seth, Karl Friston and Andy Clark?
- “Show me in a maggot!” Why we should get behind a Maggot Brain project. (58:40)
Matthew’s book The Idea of the Brain has been shortlisted for the Baillie Gifford prize. Check it out here: https://bit.ly/2Ky6IOL
***
To get in touch with Ilan or join the conversation, you can find NOUS on Twitter @NSthepodcast or on email at nousthepodcast@gmail.com
Todavía no hay opiniones