Episodios

  • A Man Named Joseph Manzaro And His Wild Claims Made Against Diddy, Lebron, Jay-Z And More

    A Man Named Joseph Manzaro And His Wild Claims Made Against Diddy, Lebron, Jay-Z And More
    May 24 2025
    ​In April 2025, Joseph Manzaro filed a lawsuit against Sean "Diddy" Combs, alleging that in 2015, he was drugged, abducted, and sexually assaulted at a party hosted by Combs. Manzaro asserts that he was forced to wear a penis mask and paraded in front of attendees, including celebrities such as Jay-Z, Beyoncé, and LeBron James. He claims that Beyoncé expressed confusion upon seeing him in this state, questioning the situation. The lawsuit describes the event as a "freak-off" party involving non-consensual acts.

    Representatives for Jay-Z and Beyoncé have denied their clients' attendance at the event, citing evidence that places them elsewhere during the time in question. Combs' legal team has dismissed Manzaro's allegations as baseless, suggesting they are attempts to gain publicity and financial compensation. The Estefans, whose property was allegedly used during the incident, also refute the claims, stating that no such events occurred at their residence during that period. This lawsuit adds to a series of legal challenges facing Combs, who is currently awaiting trial on charges including sex trafficking and racketeering.


    to contact me:

    bobbycapucci@protonmail.com



    source:

    Beyoncé, Jay-Z mentioned in Diddy human trafficking lawsuit | Fox News
    Más Menos
    14 m
  • Las Vegas Jane Doe Is Ordered To Disclose Her Identity In Her Lawsuit Against Diddy (5/24/25)

    Las Vegas Jane Doe Is Ordered To Disclose Her Identity In Her Lawsuit Against Diddy (5/24/25)
    May 24 2025
    In a ruling issued on May 13, 2025, U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick denied the plaintiff’s renewed motion to proceed anonymously in a civil case against Sean Combs. The plaintiff alleges that Combs, along with possibly one or more associates, raped her during a party in Las Vegas in 2014. While the court had initially granted her provisional anonymity on November 4, 2024—pending the defendants' formal appearance—Judge Broderick reassessed the matter once the case progressed and found that the balance of interests no longer favored anonymity.


    Judge Broderick concluded that allowing the plaintiff to proceed anonymously would unduly prejudice the defendants, particularly given the serious nature of the allegations and the public profile of the accused. He also emphasized the broader public interest in transparency, especially in a high-profile case involving a well-known public figure like Combs. The court found that these considerations outweighed the plaintiff’s privacy concerns and interest in remaining anonymous, leading to the denial of her request. The ruling underscores the judiciary’s commitment to open proceedings when they intersect with matters of public accountability and legal fairness.


    to contact me:

    bobbycapucci@protonmail.com



    source:




    gov.uscourts.nysd.630246.62.0.pdf
    Más Menos
    17 m
  • Diddy Looks To Dismiss The Dawn Richard Lawsuit (Part 6) (5/24/25)

    Diddy Looks To Dismiss The Dawn Richard Lawsuit (Part 6) (5/24/25)
    May 24 2025
    In the memorandum supporting their consolidated motion to dismiss, the defendants in the case of Dawn Angelique Richard v. Sean Combs et al. argue that the plaintiff's claims are largely time-barred under New York's statutes of limitations. They contend that the state’s shorter limitation periods should apply, rendering many of the plaintiff's causes of action untimely. Specifically, they assert that claims related to assault, battery, false imprisonment, intentional infliction of emotional distress, trafficking, forced labor, and various employment-related allegations fall outside the permissible time frames. The defendants also challenge the applicability of revival statutes, arguing that the Gender-Motivated Violence Law (GMVL) revival provision conflicts with existing laws like the Child Victims Act (CVA) and Adult Survivors Act (ASA), and thus cannot retroactively apply to the defendants.

    Additionally, the defendants argue that the plaintiff's claims against various entities associated with Sean Combs, such as the "Bad Boy" and "Combs" entities, rely on improper group pleadings without specific allegations against each entity. They assert that the GMVL claim fails because the law did not apply to certain defendants at the relevant times and that the plaintiff does not sufficiently allege a gender-motivated crime of violence. Furthermore, the defendants contend that the plaintiff fails to state valid claims for forced labor, sex trafficking, discrimination under the New York State Human Rights Law, right of publicity, and unjust enrichment. They argue that these claims are either inadequately pled or legally baseless, and in some cases, barred by applicable statutes of limitations.



    to contact me:


    bobbycapucci@protonmail.com




    source:

    gov.uscourts.nysd.628103.154.0.pdf
    Más Menos
    19 m
  • Diddy Looks To Dismiss The Dawn Richard Lawsuit (Part 5) (5/24/25)

    Diddy Looks To Dismiss The Dawn Richard Lawsuit (Part 5) (5/24/25)
    May 24 2025
    In the memorandum supporting their consolidated motion to dismiss, the defendants in the case of Dawn Angelique Richard v. Sean Combs et al. argue that the plaintiff's claims are largely time-barred under New York's statutes of limitations. They contend that the state’s shorter limitation periods should apply, rendering many of the plaintiff's causes of action untimely. Specifically, they assert that claims related to assault, battery, false imprisonment, intentional infliction of emotional distress, trafficking, forced labor, and various employment-related allegations fall outside the permissible time frames. The defendants also challenge the applicability of revival statutes, arguing that the Gender-Motivated Violence Law (GMVL) revival provision conflicts with existing laws like the Child Victims Act (CVA) and Adult Survivors Act (ASA), and thus cannot retroactively apply to the defendants.

    Additionally, the defendants argue that the plaintiff's claims against various entities associated with Sean Combs, such as the "Bad Boy" and "Combs" entities, rely on improper group pleadings without specific allegations against each entity. They assert that the GMVL claim fails because the law did not apply to certain defendants at the relevant times and that the plaintiff does not sufficiently allege a gender-motivated crime of violence. Furthermore, the defendants contend that the plaintiff fails to state valid claims for forced labor, sex trafficking, discrimination under the New York State Human Rights Law, right of publicity, and unjust enrichment. They argue that these claims are either inadequately pled or legally baseless, and in some cases, barred by applicable statutes of limitations.



    to contact me:


    bobbycapucci@protonmail.com




    source:

    gov.uscourts.nysd.628103.154.0.pdf
    Más Menos
    12 m
  • Diddy Looks To Dismiss The Dawn Richard Lawsuit (Part 4) (5/24/25)

    Diddy Looks To Dismiss The Dawn Richard Lawsuit (Part 4) (5/24/25)
    May 24 2025
    In the memorandum supporting their consolidated motion to dismiss, the defendants in the case of Dawn Angelique Richard v. Sean Combs et al. argue that the plaintiff's claims are largely time-barred under New York's statutes of limitations. They contend that the state’s shorter limitation periods should apply, rendering many of the plaintiff's causes of action untimely. Specifically, they assert that claims related to assault, battery, false imprisonment, intentional infliction of emotional distress, trafficking, forced labor, and various employment-related allegations fall outside the permissible time frames. The defendants also challenge the applicability of revival statutes, arguing that the Gender-Motivated Violence Law (GMVL) revival provision conflicts with existing laws like the Child Victims Act (CVA) and Adult Survivors Act (ASA), and thus cannot retroactively apply to the defendants.

    Additionally, the defendants argue that the plaintiff's claims against various entities associated with Sean Combs, such as the "Bad Boy" and "Combs" entities, rely on improper group pleadings without specific allegations against each entity. They assert that the GMVL claim fails because the law did not apply to certain defendants at the relevant times and that the plaintiff does not sufficiently allege a gender-motivated crime of violence. Furthermore, the defendants contend that the plaintiff fails to state valid claims for forced labor, sex trafficking, discrimination under the New York State Human Rights Law, right of publicity, and unjust enrichment. They argue that these claims are either inadequately pled or legally baseless, and in some cases, barred by applicable statutes of limitations.



    to contact me:


    bobbycapucci@protonmail.com




    source:

    gov.uscourts.nysd.628103.154.0.pdf
    Más Menos
    12 m
  • Mega Edition: The Governments Motions In Limine In The Case Against Diddy (Parts 5-6) (5/24/25)

    Mega Edition: The Governments Motions In Limine In The Case Against Diddy (Parts 5-6) (5/24/25)
    May 24 2025
    ​The U.S. government's motions in limine in the case against Sean "Diddy" Combs seek to shape the evidentiary landscape for the upcoming trial. Prosecutors aim to introduce corroborative materials such as text messages, diary entries from a former employee, and a 911 call to support the testimonies of alleged victims. They argue that these pieces of evidence are crucial to demonstrate patterns of behavior and to counter anticipated challenges to the credibility of witnesses. Additionally, the government requests the exclusion of certain defense evidence, including prior consensual sexual encounters Combs had with individuals not involved in the case, asserting that such information is irrelevant and could mislead the jury.


    Furthermore, the prosecution seeks to admit expert testimony from psychologist Dr. Dawn Hughes, who would explain how victims of abuse might remain in relationships with their abusers due to emotional manipulation or fear. This testimony is intended to provide context for the victims' continued association with Combs, which the defense might use to question their credibility. The motions also address the admissibility of a 2016 surveillance video allegedly showing Combs assaulting his ex-girlfriend, Cassie Ventura. The defense contests this video's inclusion, claiming it has been altered and lacks authenticity


    to contact me:

    bobbycapucci@protonmail.com



    source:

    gov.uscourts.nysd.628425.260.0_1.pdf
    Más Menos
    24 m
  • Mega Edition: The Governments Motions In Limine In The Case Against Diddy (Parts 3-4) (5/24/25)

    Mega Edition: The Governments Motions In Limine In The Case Against Diddy (Parts 3-4) (5/24/25)
    May 24 2025
    ​The U.S. government's motions in limine in the case against Sean "Diddy" Combs seek to shape the evidentiary landscape for the upcoming trial. Prosecutors aim to introduce corroborative materials such as text messages, diary entries from a former employee, and a 911 call to support the testimonies of alleged victims. They argue that these pieces of evidence are crucial to demonstrate patterns of behavior and to counter anticipated challenges to the credibility of witnesses. Additionally, the government requests the exclusion of certain defense evidence, including prior consensual sexual encounters Combs had with individuals not involved in the case, asserting that such information is irrelevant and could mislead the jury.


    Furthermore, the prosecution seeks to admit expert testimony from psychologist Dr. Dawn Hughes, who would explain how victims of abuse might remain in relationships with their abusers due to emotional manipulation or fear. This testimony is intended to provide context for the victims' continued association with Combs, which the defense might use to question their credibility. The motions also address the admissibility of a 2016 surveillance video allegedly showing Combs assaulting his ex-girlfriend, Cassie Ventura. The defense contests this video's inclusion, claiming it has been altered and lacks authenticity


    to contact me:

    bobbycapucci@protonmail.com



    source:

    gov.uscourts.nysd.628425.260.0_1.pdf
    Más Menos
    23 m
  • Stuntman John Doe And His Allegations Against Diddy (Part 3)

    Stuntman John Doe And His Allegations Against Diddy (Part 3)
    May 24 2025
    In Case No. 1:24-cv-08812, filed on November 19, 2024, in the Southern District of New York, the plaintiff, identified as John Doe, alleges that in October 2001, he was lured to New York City under the pretense of auditioning for a role as a police officer in a music video. After coordinating with a female casting director, he traveled to Manhattan, booking a room at the Hotel Newton on the Upper West Side. The following day, he was directed to a suite near the top of a hotel located on the south side of Central Park.

    The plaintiff claims that upon arrival, he was offered a Diet Coke that tasted unusual. Subsequently, he began to feel disoriented and lost consciousness. He alleges that he awoke to find Sean "Diddy" Combs sexually assaulting him, with Combs's bodyguard restraining his arms. After the assault, the plaintiff asserts that he fled the scene. The lawsuit seeks compensatory and punitive damages for the alleged assault, emphasizing a pattern of such behavior by Combs over the years, purportedly facilitated by various individuals and entities.

    (commercial at 8:26)

    to contact me:

    bobbycapucci@protonmail.com


    source:

    gov.uscourts.nysd.632028.1.0.pdf
    Más Menos
    11 m
adbl_web_global_use_to_activate_T1_webcro805_stickypopup