The Emily Show Podcast Por Baker Media LLC. arte de portada

The Emily Show

The Emily Show

De: Baker Media LLC.
Escúchala gratis

Acerca de esta escucha

Get ready for some legal drama and a whole lot of sass on The Emily Show, hosted by none other than the internet's favorite legal analyst, Emily D Baker. With over 17 years of experience as a lawyer and former LA Deputy District Attorney, Emily gives you the lowdown on the hottest legal stories everyone is talking about. Her unique blend of smarts, sarcasm, and colorful language will have you laughing and learning at the same time. But that's not all, y'all! Emily shares her wild and hilarious stories from her time as a LA County Deputy District Attorney and gives you a glimpse into the life of a YouTube creator with millions of monthly views. Don't miss out on the legal commentary and behind-the-scenes action, head over to YouTube at www.WatchEmily.Com and connect with Emily on Instagram @TheEmilyDBaker for even more law, life, and coffee chat. With The Emily Show, you'll be a law nerd in no time! This podcast uses the following third-party services for analysis: Spotify Ad Analytics - https://www.spotify.com/us/legal/ad-analytics-privacy-policy/ Podscribe - https://podscribe.com/privacyCopyright 2020-2025 Baker Media, LLC all rights reserved Crímenes Reales Política y Gobierno
Episodios
  • Jury Issues? Commonwealth Medical Expert Dr. Wolf | Case Brief
    May 22 2025

    Watch the full coverage of the live stream on The Emily D Baker YouTube channel: https://youtube.com/live/bmNghhaIVik

    Day 20 of the Karen Read Retrial happened on May 21, 2025. Involving court delays, individual jurors questioned at sidebar, and a shift in witness order. Judge Cannone addressed the jury when they came back from the inquiry and asked them if they refrained from doing research or independent investigations. She noted that she had already asked them about discussing the case with anyone or seeing, hearing or reading information about the case. Their seats were rearranged and the court day moved forward.


    Dr. Aizik Wolf, a neuro brain surgeon, testified about the injuries to John O'Keefe's head, stating they were consistent with a fall backward. The doctor also clarified that other facial lacerations would not have been caused by this type of fall.


    Scientific evidence from Christina Hanley, a Trace Analyst, a state crime lab, analyzed the glass and plastic fragments. She linked clear and red plastic pieces from John O'Keefe's clothing to the tail light housing. Defense Attorney, Alan Jackson, presented a demonstrative exhibit showing which evidence items matched and which didn't. The ones that didn't match were collected by Trooper Michael Proctor.


    RESOURCES

    Retrial Day 17 - https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=P_Lo2vXvHyM

    What You Need to Know About the Retrial - https://youtu.be/89Jpa8vz1RQ

    Karen Read Retrial Playlist - https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PLsbUyvZas7gKOJlfL__9F027hlETVU-vo

    Karen Read Trial - 2024 - https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PLsbUyvZas7gKUeCUzApgsEuQRXu5IXeTS



    This podcast uses the following third-party services for analysis:

    Spotify Ad Analytics - https://www.spotify.com/us/legal/ad-analytics-privacy-policy/
    Podscribe - https://podscribe.com/privacy
    Más Menos
    20 m
  • New Karen Read Timeline Statements. Cross of Aperture Expert, the wrong date? | Case Brief
    May 21 2025

    Watch the full coverage of the live stream on The Emily D Baker YouTube channel: https://youtube.com/live/IJgD247smlQ

    Day 19 of the Karen Read Retrial happened on May 20, 2025. Defense Attorney, Robert Alessi, continued cross examining Shanon Burgess. Questions arose regarding the accuracy of dates and timeline in the expert's analysis, with errors of 24 hours. Burgess kept saying that the event happened the night of January 29-30th when in reality is it was January 28-29th.


    Shanon's analysis of call logs, text streams, and vehicle data was scrutinized. There were concerns about the use of approximate times and potential confirmation bias. The expert did not have the raw data for the techstream information, he instead got it from Welcher's report.


    During redirect examination, Special Prosecutor, Hank Brennan, attempted to clarify Burgess' credentials and data interpretation. Pointing out that he didn't need that degree to perform his job and that work life balance made it a challenge to complete his degree.


    On Re-Cross Examination, Alessi pointed out that in a federal court filing in Texas, Burgess' resume stated he was anticipating a BGS - Bachelor of General Science in 2024. There is no Bachelor of General Science degree in Alabama and he has been pursuing this degree since 2008.


    The use of the Commonwealths presenting video and audio clips, especially the voicemail, appears to be related to establishing a timeline of Karen Read's movements and actions around the time of John O'Keefe's death. The defense may use it to show her actions were consistent, while the prosecution may use it to point out inconsistencies. The 12:25/12:30 timeframe she gives for John's passing may be challenged given her audio from the voicemail at 12:41AM.


    Later in the day, Christina Hanley, a trace analyst expert witness from the lab testified about a mechanical match on glass. The court adjourned early after sidebar discussions. We'll get back to her on Day 20.


    RESOURCES

    Retrial Day 10 - Voicemails - https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=r2vEF0vxG2w

    What You Need to Know About the Retrial - https://youtu.be/89Jpa8vz1RQ

    Karen Read Retrial Playlist - https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PLsbUyvZas7gKOJlfL__9F027hlETVU-vo

    Karen Read Trial - 2024 - https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PLsbUyvZas7gKUeCUzApgsEuQRXu5IXeTS



    This podcast uses the following third-party services for analysis:

    Spotify Ad Analytics - https://www.spotify.com/us/legal/ad-analytics-privacy-policy/
    Podscribe - https://podscribe.com/privacy
    Más Menos
    30 m
  • Wild Cross of Prosecution Key Expert. The New Report, Typos and Misunderstandings? | Case Brief
    May 20 2025

    Watch the full coverage of the live stream on The Emily D Baker YouTube channel: https://youtube.com/live/Hi_HNpRVySA

    Day 18 of the Karen Read Retrial happened on May 19, 2025. Shanon Burgess, a Digital Forensic Examiner from Aperture, is witness number 35. His testimony revolves around correlating the timing of events from Karen Read's Lexus vehicle data and John O'Keefe's phone location data.


    Burgess provided detailed explanations of Lexus infotainment system data (Lexus clock and techstream data), key cycles, triggering events (like a three-point turn), and how this data was correlated with the data from John O'Keefe's iPhone. Time variances between the Lexus clock and the iPhone clock and the significance of these variances in relation to when O'Keefe's phone was locked.


    Defense Attorney, Robert Alessi, strongly challenged Burgess's credibility during cross examination by highlighting discrepancies and potential misrepresentations in his CV (resume), Aperture website information, and LinkedIn profile concerning his educational background and degrees.


    Questions were also raised about a report Burgess submitted on May 8th, at the request of the prosecution. Burgess stated he did it on his own initiative due to the report from the Defense's expert. It was thought that he did it at the request of the prosecutor but attributed the "per your request" statement to a copy-paste error.


    Alessi further challenged Burgess's understanding of data storage (megabits vs. megabytes) and the completeness of data extractions from the vehicle's chips. This could significantly impact the jury's perception of Shanon's testimony and the prosecution's case. The errors and inconsistencies in his statements, reports, and qualifications raise serious questions about the reliability of his expert opinions. There's more cross examination to come on Day 19.


    RESOURCES

    What You Need to Know About the Retrial - https://youtu.be/89Jpa8vz1RQ

    Karen Read Retrial Playlist - https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PLsbUyvZas7gKOJlfL__9F027hlETVU-vo

    Karen Read Trial - 2024 - https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PLsbUyvZas7gKUeCUzApgsEuQRXu5IXeTS



    This podcast uses the following third-party services for analysis:

    Spotify Ad Analytics - https://www.spotify.com/us/legal/ad-analytics-privacy-policy/
    Podscribe - https://podscribe.com/privacy
    Más Menos
    31 m
adbl_web_global_use_to_activate_T1_webcro805_stickypopup
Todas las estrellas
Más relevante  
found emily d baker on YouTube during the depp v heard trial and I've been hooked to her platforms on social media since!
her YouTube channel is great and her community feels safe and free from discrimination. she has such high values for her listeners. that it's not about name calling or vitriol towards people but instead understanding of differences between people and reviewing facts!!!
always a huge fan! love her commentary!

love Emily D Baker

Se ha producido un error. Vuelve a intentarlo dentro de unos minutos.

This interview was wonderful. So interesting to hear about his journey thru life. His music is very good. I hope he continues to do more of that as well as his law work. I need to go back and catch his wife's name to see if she has music on Spotify too. Great job Emily - your interviews and live streams are not only illuminating and entertaining but I love how you help other people wether its just bringing attention to them or giving them advice in how to navigate you tube etc.

Love the Emily show

Se ha producido un error. Vuelve a intentarlo dentro de unos minutos.

EDB explains everything so clearly. Very proud to say I’m a Law and Paw Nerd!

Fantastic Podcast

Se ha producido un error. Vuelve a intentarlo dentro de unos minutos.

Emily is factual and great at explaining what the legal terms mean. Fun to listen to her show's.

Love Emily D!

Se ha producido un error. Vuelve a intentarlo dentro de unos minutos.

Emily always makes things interesting and so very clear, as well as being quite good with presenting all sides. I'm happy for her continued success! She deserves it! This is an excellent podcast (and YouTube channel) and I highly recommend it to everybody even remotely interested in nationally known legal cases. I've never heard or watched an episode that was boring, no matter which case she is covering.

Aside from always making things extremely interesting and clear, she is very good with presenting all sides, which I appreciate a lot. It's refreshing to have someone present the facts without just presenting what they feel personally. Unfortunately, most people just give their view and that's it. Its a common thing these days (even in legacy media) and an unwelcome trend. I appreciate that even when it is obvious where her opinion lies, she will argue with equal fervor other positions. I like to form my own opinion and not just be told what to think about something and Emily delivers!

Fantastic podcast - highly recommend!

Se ha producido un error. Vuelve a intentarlo dentro de unos minutos.

love how she breaks down all the legal stuff of the juicy celebrity gossip stuff giving the correct legal facts...but w humor when warranted

legal facts/breakdowns w respect & humor

Se ha producido un error. Vuelve a intentarlo dentro de unos minutos.

Emily does an amazing job breaking down lawsuits for everyone to understand. I've been following Leah Remini acting carrier for a very long time. When she left Scientology is when I learned so much about what happens to people that leave. IMO the church is a cult. I watched Leah's special about leaving the church and seen a lot of stuff that happen to her as well as others. When she talked about her friend Shelly being missing I got worried. I hope Emily will cover this case as it plays out in the court.

Thank you

Se ha producido un error. Vuelve a intentarlo dentro de unos minutos.

Every episode is a great breakdown of the legal stickiness in a format that is relatable, fun, and educational.

Excellent and fun breakdown of legal topics!

Se ha producido un error. Vuelve a intentarlo dentro de unos minutos.

If you like legal commentary related to anything going on in the world. Listen to Emily.

I live for this podcast!

Se ha producido un error. Vuelve a intentarlo dentro de unos minutos.

The best and most authentic legal commentator on the internet! Educational and entertaining with brilliant insights.

Always a great listen!

Se ha producido un error. Vuelve a intentarlo dentro de unos minutos.

Ver más opiniones