A cyber attack on UNFI, the main distributor for Whole Foods, reveals how single points of failure in interconnected business systems can cause widespread chaos. We explore the risks of fragile business models and how Integrated Risk Management (IRM) transforms vulnerabilities into strategic resilience.

• Modern business efficiency often creates "brittle by design" systems with dangerous hidden dependencies
• The UNFI cyber attack caused empty store shelves and $300 million in market value loss
• Concentration risk applies beyond food logistics to any business with critical single-vendor dependencies
• IRM provides an enterprise-wide lens connecting risk intelligence across previously siloed domains
• Key IRM implementation steps: asset visibility mapping, operational rehearsals, and executive accountability
• Companies with mature IRM recover 27% faster from disruptions with 42% lower earnings volatility
• Five-point actionable playbook: concentration risk census, specific contract requirements, scenario simulations
• Unified risk dashboards and board education elevate resilience from compliance to strategic priority

Don't forget to subscribe on your favorite podcast platform—whether it's Apple Podcasts, Spotify, or Amazon Music.

Please contact us directly at info@wheelhouseadvisors.com or feel free to connect with us on LinkedIn and X.com.

Visit www.therisktechjournal.com to learn more about the topics discussed in today's episode.

Autonomous Integrated Risk Management (IRM) is becoming a reality with AI-powered tools providing real value, but many implementations suffer from disconnected systems that prevent true strategic alignment.

• Automated risk management tools often operate in isolation within the middle validation layer
• Wheelhouse Advisors' IRM Navigator™ Model identifies five interconnected layers: strategic oversight, business orchestration, threat intelligence/validation, remediation/response, and verification/audit
• Most automation is happening in layer three (threat intelligence/validation) but lacks strategic input from layer one and verification feedback from layer five
• Toyota's 2022 credential exposure incident demonstrates how disconnected layers can miss critical risks for years
• Effective autonomous IRM requires a two-way flow of information – strategy flowing down and validation results flowing back up
• Risk leaders should map their systems to the five layers, tag strategic assets, feed audit data back to validation tools, and measure business impact rather than just technical metrics
• The sequence for improvement should be: simplify, automate, integrate – don't automate broken processes

To maximize the value of autonomous IRM in your organization, focus on connecting your technical capabilities with strategic priorities and verification processes to create a living, learning system that protects what matters most to the business.

Don't forget to subscribe on your favorite podcast platform—whether it's Apple Podcasts, Spotify, or Amazon Music.

Please contact us directly at info@wheelhouseadvisors.com or feel free to connect with us on LinkedIn and X.com.

Visit www.therisktechjournal.com to learn more about the topics discussed in today's episode.

A single boardroom confrontation at SunTrust Bank in 2007 serves as the dramatic starting point for understanding a critical business blindspot. When a senior risk executive warned leadership about their reckless mortgage expansion strategy, he wasn't just ignored—he was exiled. Within months, his predictions came tragically true as the global financial crisis erupted, eventually costing SunTrust a billion-dollar settlement with the Department of Justice.

This compelling narrative unveils a stunning parallel between corporate risk blindness and a fundamental flaw in the risk management technology industry. For years, Governance, Risk and Compliance (GRC) software promised to help organizations manage risk effectively, but its architecture betrayed its purpose. These systems excelled at organizing documents and compliance checklists while marketing themselves as providing "risk intelligence," yet they systematically failed to deliver the strategic insights needed for genuinely informed decision-making.

The watershed moment arrived in 2018 with the emergence of Integrated Risk Management (IRM)—not as the natural evolution of GRC but as a necessary correction to its architectural limitations. Where GRC connected documents, IRM connects decisions. Where GRC supported compliance checklists, IRM supports strategic choices in navigating uncertainty. The distinction isn't semantic; it's fundamental to organizational resilience. SunTrust's post-crisis implementation of yet another GRC solution predictably failed, highlighting the episode's most profound takeaway: true risk intelligence isn't a product you purchase—it's a capability you must architect and integrate into your organization's very fabric. Have you examined whether your risk management systems are truly providing intelligence or merely organizing ignorance?

Don't forget to subscribe on your favorite podcast platform—whether it's Apple Podcasts, Spotify, or Amazon Music.

Please contact us directly at info@wheelhouseadvisors.com or feel free to connect with us on LinkedIn and X.com.

Visit www.therisktechjournal.com to learn more about the topics discussed in today's episode.

In this week's episode, we unpack the revolutionary approach of Integrated Risk Thinking (IRT) and how it transforms traditional risk management into a strategic advantage for modern businesses.

• Traditional risk management and GRC often works in silos, missing how interconnected different risks truly are
• IRT is a mindset shift, not just a process or software solution
• Risk insights should be used as strategic intelligence to shape business decisions
• The IRM Navigator™ Model provides structure with four domains: ERM, ORM, TRM, and GRC
• Five core principles of IRT create a foundation: strategic intelligence, cross-functional integration, proactive management, enterprise-wide ownership, and adaptability
• Organizations embracing IRT experience enhanced strategic execution and greater resilience
• The global IRM technology market is projected to grow from $61.6 billion (2025) to $134 billion (2032)
• The biggest risk may not be external threats but the limitations of a fragmented approach to managing them

For more information and resources on Integrated Risk Thinking and the IRM Navigator™ Model, visit wheelhouseadvisors.com.

Don't forget to subscribe on your favorite podcast platform—whether it's Apple Podcasts, Spotify, or Amazon Music.

Please contact us directly at info@wheelhouseadvisors.com or feel free to connect with us on LinkedIn and X.com.

Visit www.therisktechjournal.com to learn more about the topics discussed in today's episode.

McKinsey's provocative May 2025 report on Governance, Risk and Compliance reveals a startling reality: despite massive investments, traditional GRC approaches are falling short in today's complex business environment. Their survey of nearly 200 corporate leaders uncovers five critical weaknesses that suggest nothing less than a fundamental paradigm shift is needed.

The first alarm bell rings when examining how risk functions are positioned within organizations. With 44% of risk leaders situated more than one level below the CEO and risk considerations often arriving too late in strategic discussions, companies make crucial decisions without proper risk evaluation. Meanwhile, technology investments create an "illusion of integration" – sophisticated systems that document the past but fail to provide the foresight needed for emerging threats. Perhaps most telling, 68% of organizations don't link executive compensation to compliance or ethical performance, revealing a profound disconnect between stated values and actual incentives.

What emerges from McKinsey's analysis points toward Integrated Risk Management (IRM) as a potential solution – breaking down silos to embed risk thinking across all decision-making processes. This approach transforms risk management from a checkbox exercise into a strategic advantage, connecting risk oversight with business execution through real-time data insights. The future demands organizations move beyond static risk registers toward dynamic, forward-looking capabilities like scenario planning and horizon scanning. The question for leaders becomes clear: is your approach to governance, risk and compliance genuinely integrated, or is an evolution needed to navigate tomorrow's uncertainties? Take this deep dive with us to discover what truly effective risk management looks like in a rapidly changing world.

Don't forget to subscribe on your favorite podcast platform—whether it's Apple Podcasts, Spotify, or Amazon Music.

Please contact us directly at info@wheelhouseadvisors.com or feel free to connect with us on LinkedIn and X.com.

Visit www.therisktechjournal.com to learn more about the topics discussed in today's episode.

A seismic shift is underway in the Integrated Risk Management (IRM) technology market, revealed through an unexpected stock sell-off that signals much deeper transformations. What appeared as a minor tremor—Workiva's stock declining despite positive earnings—actually illuminates fundamental changes in how regulatory uncertainty directly impacts market valuations and growth expectations.

The catalyst? Whispers about potential delays to the EU's Corporate Sustainability Reporting Directive and paused sustainability rules created immediate investor concern. But this reaction points to a more profound reality: the IRM market no longer operates on technology innovation alone. It's now inextricably linked with regulatory timetables, political decisions, and strategic business imperatives beyond compliance.

Our analysis reveals distinct patterns across IRM segments. Governance, Risk and Compliance (GRC) platforms feel regulatory shifts most acutely, with legacy vendors potentially facing steeper challenges than modern, flexible alternatives. Enterprise Risk Management (ERM) demonstrates greater resilience through its focus on strategic decision-making rather than specific regulations. Operational Risk Management (ORM) balances compliance with growing emphasis on business continuity amid cyber threats and supply chain disruptions. Meanwhile, Technology Risk Management (TRM) emerges as the standout segment, forecasted for 12.9% CAGR through 2032, largely immune to ESG regulatory uncertainty while addressing what many boards now view as existential business risks.

The strategic message becomes clear: integration across these different risk domains provides the key to true business resilience. The future belongs to platforms offering comprehensive, adaptive frameworks for managing uncertainty—not just compliance tools. As regulations become increasingly unpredictable, organizations must strike a delicate balance between compliance needs and building genuine operational resilience for whatever challenges emerge next. How is your organization navigating this evolution?

Don't forget to subscribe on your favorite podcast platform—whether it's Apple Podcasts, Spotify, or Amazon Music.

Please contact us directly at info@wheelhouseadvisors.com or feel free to connect with us on LinkedIn and X.com.

Visit www.therisktechjournal.com to learn more about the topics discussed in today's episode.

A presentation at the 2025 Mitratech Interact Conference advocated for a dual approach to risk management, moving beyond traditional compliance-focused methods. The speakers proposed viewing risk through two "lenses": one focused on assurance and compliance, and the other on performance and resilience. This integration allows organizations to balance protecting their core operations with enabling future growth and strategic objectives. ACI Worldwide's experience illustrated this evolution, showing how risk management can mature from a fragmented function to an embedded, value-adding capability. The discussion emphasized that modern risk management should be proactive, integrated into decision-making, and utilize forward-looking tools to enhance business value and resilience.

Don't forget to subscribe on your favorite podcast platform—whether it's Apple Podcasts, Spotify, or Amazon Music.

Please contact us directly at info@wheelhouseadvisors.com or feel free to connect with us on LinkedIn and X.com.

Visit www.therisktechjournal.com to learn more about the topics discussed in today's episode.

Wheelhouse Advisors' article in The RiskTech Journal reports on a 2025 Mitratech conference session emphasizing the need to reframe risk management from a reactive compliance function to a proactive, strategically integrated capability. The session, featuring insights from Wheelhouse Advisors and ACI Worldwide, advocated for a three-part model (Flip, Adopt, Manage) and highlighted ACI's journey in simplifying, integrating, and enabling risk management. Key takeaways stressed the importance of translating risk value into action, developing an integrated approach, and managing risk dynamically to build organizational resilience as a competitive advantage. Ultimately, the piece argues for a shift in the risk management mandate, urging leaders to move beyond control to cultivate a strategic business capability.

Don't forget to subscribe on your favorite podcast platform—whether it's Apple Podcasts, Spotify, or Amazon Music.

Please contact us directly at info@wheelhouseadvisors.com or feel free to connect with us on LinkedIn and X.com.

Visit www.therisktechjournal.com to learn more about the topics discussed in today's episode.