TWIP-250525 We are witnessing a profound shift—one that is growing stronger, louder, and more undeniable with each passing day. The global stance on Palestine and the Palestinian people is changing, breaking through years of silence, complicity, and suppression. Across nations, activists from all backgrounds, regardless of religion or political affiliation, are refusing to stand idly by. They are raising their voices, marching in the streets, disrupting power structures, and demanding an end to the genocide that has unfolded before the world’s eyes.

Within Israel itself, cracks are forming in the system. Israeli soldiers, once unquestioning participants in the occupation, are refusing to serve. Some are rejecting orders, refusing to bomb civilian areas, and even stepping forward as vocal supporters of Palestine. This defiance speaks volumes—it reveals the fractures in the Israeli establishment, the unease within its own ranks, and the growing awareness that history will not be kind to those who participated in ethnic cleansing.

Politicians who once stood firm in their unconditional support for Israel are now hesitating. Their tone is shifting as public pressure mounts. The protests, boycotts, and demands for accountability are forcing them to acknowledge the atrocities unfolding in Gaza and the West Bank. As more leaders step forward to condemn Israel’s actions, the political landscape is shifting. What was once a rigid, unquestioned support system is now facing scrutiny, cracks, and outright rejection by those unwilling to be complicit in genocide.

Perhaps one of the most telling transformations is within the media—the very institutions that have long been loyal defenders of Zionist narratives. These platforms, which once ignored Palestinian voices and dismissed reports of apartheid and ethnic cleansing, are now struggling to maintain their facade. They can no longer hide behind selective coverage and sanitized rhetoric. The weight of undeniable evidence—the images, the videos, the firsthand accounts—has forced their hand. Anchors who once deflected criticism of Israel are now speaking of genocide. Analysts who avoided the topic are now dissecting Israel’s war crimes. The truth is emerging, and they have nowhere left to hide.

And perhaps the most powerful force behind this change? Students. From the campuses of Columbia, Harvard, George Washington University, and beyond, student activists are refusing to be silenced. They are organizing sit-ins, erecting protest encampments, demanding their universities divest from companies profiting off Palestinian suffering. They are shutting down lectures, disrupting ceremonies, pressuring administrations, forcing the conversation into spaces where it was once unwelcome. Their voices are undeniable, their demands uncompromising. They are the generation that refuses to inherit silence.

This is not just a moment—it is a movement. The tide has turned. The world is watching, the people are rising, and history is being rewritten before our eyes. Palestinian liberation is not a distant dream—it is an imminent reality.

The UK government has undergone a significant shift in its approach to Israel since the Labour Party took office. Foreign Secretary David Lammy has notably changed policies on arms sales, international law, and humanitarian aid.

One of the most striking moves was the restoration of UK funding to UNRWA, the UN agency for Palestinian refugees, after it had been suspended due to unproven Israeli allegations. Additionally, the UK has dropped its opposition to the International Criminal Court’s (ICC) arrest warrant for Israeli leaders, a decision that has sparked concern among Jewish communal bodies.

While Labour had previously called for transparency on arms sales to Israel, Lammy has yet to publish the legal advice on whether UK arms exports should be suspended. These shifts indicate a departure from the previous Conservative government’s stance, with some seeing it as a move toward greater accountability, while others worry it marks a distancing from Israel as a key ally.

There has been a growing international push to hold Israel accountable for its actions in Gaza and the occupied Palestinian territories. The International Court of Justice (ICJ) recently issued an advisory opinion stating that Israel's policies in the region violate international law, including findings of apartheid. Additionally, a UN-backed commission has accused Israel of committing war crimes and crimes against humanity during the ongoing conflict.

Public opinion is also shifting, with increased scrutiny from human rights organizations and some governments reconsidering their stance on arms sales and diplomatic support. However, enforcement remains a challenge, as key allies like the United States continue to provide military aid and political backing.

The question now is whether these legal and diplomatic pressures will translate into meaningful consequences.

The US has long turned a blind eye to the killings in Gaza and across Palestine. While global awareness of Israel’s crimes grows, the US and European governments continue to defend Israel’s so-called "right to self-defense," fueling outrage among people worldwide. Social media, news reports, and even some governments have amplified the outcry—this genocide can no longer be concealed by silence.

Sooner or later, accountability will come. Presidents and politicians who refused to hold Israel responsible will face scrutiny. Their legacies will crumble, condemned to the dustbin of history. They will be remembered as cowards, complicit in genocide.

The story of Hind Rajab, a young girl whose tragic fate reached millions, remains unresolved—a year later, justice has not been served. Yet hers is just one of over 50,000 stories waiting to be told since the brutal assault on Gaza began. And beyond this, there are millions more untold since 1948. The world will not forget.

TWIP-250504 Today we are listing to Yousef Munayyer a Palestinian – American writer and political analyst based in Washington D.C. Mr. Munayyer was the executive director of the US Campaign for Palestinian Rights. Previously he directed the Jerusalem Fund for Education and Community Development and it’s educational program, The Palestine Center and also a policy analyst with the American Arab Anti-Discrimination Committee. Today we will listen to his discussion Sarah Ann Minkin during the Jewish left Conference which was sponsored by the Boston University Institute on Culture, Religion, and World Affairs. Before that we will listen to story from Democracy Now.

The Killing of Palestinians is the plane of making Gaza uninhabited.

Israel, both materially and rhetorically has made their intent to destroy the Palestinian people clear. One of the most renowned and courageous Middle East scholars, Norman Finkelstein, has assiduously documented the Palestinian Plight for decades and he joins host Chris Hedges Report. Finkelstein and Hedges asses the current state of the genocide in Palestine as well as how the media and the universities have all but abandoned their principles in servitude to the Zionist agenda.

The killing of journalists and paramedics in Palestine is a tragic and deeply concerning issue. These individuals often risk their lives to provide critical services and report on the realities of conflict. Targeting them not only violates international laws but also undermines the principles of humanity and freedom of the press. Such acts highlight the urgent need for accountability and protection for those working in dangerous environments. The international community must advocate for justice and ensure that perpetrators face consequences. Every life lost in these circumstances is a reminder of the human cost of conflict. This issue demands global attention and action to uphold human rights and dignity.

The disparity between life in stable regions and the existence of Palestinians under occupation is profound. For those in stable environments, daily concerns often revolve around personal goals, leisure, and the pursuit of opportunities. In contrast, Palestinians living under siege and apartheid face constant challenges to their basic rights and survival. Their movement is restricted by checkpoints and barriers, access to healthcare and education is limited, and the threat of violence looms over their communities. While many of us enjoy freedoms to express ourselves and live without fear, Palestinians often endure systemic oppression, forced displacement, and the psychological toll of living in a conflict zone. This stark contrast serves as a reminder of the privileges some take for granted and the resilience of those who fight for their dignity and freedom.

Donald Trump’s plan to take over Gaza has sparked widespread outrage and concern, and for good reason. The proposal, which envisions the U.S. taking ownership of Gaza and transforming it into the so-called "Riviera of the Middle East," is not only audacious but also deeply problematic. At its core, the plan involves the forced relocation of approximately two million Palestinians to neighboring countries—a move that blatantly violates international law, which prohibits the forcible transfer of populations. This aspect alone has drawn condemnation from human rights organizations and international leaders alike.

The vision Trump has laid out includes clearing the war-torn region of its rubble and unexploded ordnance, leveling the land, and redeveloping it into a luxurious destination. While this might sound appealing on the surface, it completely disregards the aspirations and rights of the Palestinian people, who have long sought self-determination and statehood. Instead of addressing their needs or the root causes of the conflict, the plan seeks to erase their presence and history from the land.

Critics have also pointed out the logistical and ethical challenges of such a proposal. The cost of rebuilding Gaza is estimated to be in the tens of billions of dollars, and the idea of forcibly removing an entire population raises serious moral questions. Moreover, the plan has no buy-in from Palestinians, who have roundly rejected it, nor from neighboring Arab states, which have expressed strong opposition. Even within the U.S., the proposal has been met with skepticism, with analysts questioning its feasibility and legality.

Trump’s plan represents a stark departure from decades of U.S. foreign policy, which has traditionally emphasized a two-state solution as the path to peace. By proposing to "take over" Gaza, Trump not only undermines this long-standing approach but also risks further destabilizing the region. The plan has been described as a nightmare scenario, one that prioritizes grandiose visions over the lives and rights of millions of people. It is a reminder of the dangers of unilateral decision-making and the importance of centering human dignity in any effort to resolve conflicts.

Today we will be talking about Trumps plan of taking over Gaza.