
LikeWar
The Weaponization of Social Media
No se pudo agregar al carrito
Add to Cart failed.
Error al Agregar a Lista de Deseos.
Error al eliminar de la lista de deseos.
Error al añadir a tu biblioteca
Error al seguir el podcast
Error al dejar de seguir el podcast
$0.00 por los primeros 30 días
Compra ahora por $21.49
No default payment method selected.
We are sorry. We are not allowed to sell this product with the selected payment method
-
Narrado por:
-
George Guidall
Two defense experts explore the collision of war, politics, and social media, where the most important battles are now only a click away.
Through the weaponization of social media, the Internet is changing war and politics, just as war and politics are changing the Internet. Terrorists livestream their attacks, “Twitter wars” produce real world casualties, and viral misinformation alters not just the result of battles, but the very fate of nations. The result is that war, tech, and politics have blurred into a new kind of battlespace that plays out on our smartphones.
P. W. Singer and Emerson Brooking tackle the mind bending questions that arise when war goes online and the online world goes to war. They explore how ISIS copies the Instagram tactics of Taylor Swift, a former World of Warcraft addict foils war crimes thousands of miles away, Internet trolls shape elections, and China uses a smartphone app to police the thoughts of 1.4 billion citizens. What can be kept secret in a world of networks? Does social media expose the truth or bury it? And what role do ordinary people now play in international conflicts?
Delving into the web’s darkest corners, we meet the unexpected warriors of social media, such as the rapper turned jihadist PR czar and the Russian hipsters who wage unceasing infowars against the West. Finally, looking to the crucial years ahead, LikeWar outlines a radical new paradigm for understanding and defending against the unprecedented threats of our networked world.
©2018 P.W. Singer and Emerson T. Brooking (P)2018 Recorded BooksListeners also enjoyed...




















Las personas que vieron esto también vieron:


















Illuminating, and disconcerting
Se ha producido un error. Vuelve a intentarlo dentro de unos minutos.
Should be "Like Required Reading"
Se ha producido un error. Vuelve a intentarlo dentro de unos minutos.
Must listen
Se ha producido un error. Vuelve a intentarlo dentro de unos minutos.
Pretty good book
Se ha producido un error. Vuelve a intentarlo dentro de unos minutos.
A must read.
Se ha producido un error. Vuelve a intentarlo dentro de unos minutos.
The Absolute best and up to date...
Se ha producido un error. Vuelve a intentarlo dentro de unos minutos.
There are some flaws that stood out to me where points are made that mistranslation of words are used in propaganda, no doubt this is true but 'cadaver' is German for dead body, it can imply animal in context but generally to be explicit German would specify 'tier'. This does not invalidate the point but subtly makes another, which isn't then addressed. One could say its in the negative space... . Either way, this makes me wonder about other facts which might not be so specifically, though it does not detract from the point being made, and in the context is minor. This certainly is not what the thrust of the book rests upon, and only comes up once but it stood out to me.
That nitpick aside, great book.
Some minor flaws, but the gist is correct
Se ha producido un error. Vuelve a intentarlo dentro de unos minutos.
There are deep philosophical & social ramifications of this work
Se ha producido un error. Vuelve a intentarlo dentro de unos minutos.
Social Media is the Battlefield of the Future
Se ha producido un error. Vuelve a intentarlo dentro de unos minutos.
- by gangs to extend conflict form on-line to in-person
- by terrorist groups such as ISIS to ‘prepare the battlespace’ and win battles almost without fighting them
- by countries like Russia for propaganda and repression
- by repressive regimes like China for systems repression
- by Trump supporters in the 2016 election
It does paint a compelling and chilling picture.
However, the picture is incomplete and somewhat distorted, perhaps even intentionally biased. The Authors seem intent on repeatedly associating terrorists, Russia, China, and Trump supporters that they avoid what would seem to be obvious topics that would fill out the story such as:
- They note that social media platforms, such as Google and Facebook, are controlled by a few powerful moguls and key ranking algorithms. However, they say nothing about how these platforms employ those algorithms to influence what stories people see on these platforms in line with the political beliefs, and campaign contributions, of their owners. They suggest that the social media executives are apolitical, but reality has proven that to be abjectly false. In failing to note these types of things, they then miss a larger topic of how, just as repressive regimes control what is seen and believed, so can tech elites, aside from governments.
-
- They fail to make a seemingly obvious comparison between the efficacy of social media campaigns, such as Trump’s, relative to the reach and impact of friendly coverage in the ‘mainstream media’ news, late night talk shows, etc. This seemed an odd oversight in that it talks about how these social media campaigns are akin to asymmetric warfare but misses the obvious comparison here. In many cases, the social media campaigns are seen (rightly or wrongly) as a response to what’s going on in the mainstream media.
-
- They seem to consciously avoid discussion of the use of social media weaponization by groups on the other end of the US political spectrum (Antifa, BLM, etc.) to set up flash mobs, organize demonstrations, and turn online threats into physical ones by releasing private addresses or locations of political figures they encourage people to harass or threaten.
Due to when it was published, the book also misses discussing how, in response to some of the concerns about the weaponization, the platforms have implemented their own control mechanisms, such as Facebook fact checkers. Or how Biden’s DHS tried to create an office to combat domestic disinformation, with strong shadows of 1984’s Ministry of Truth. In looking at these, they would seemingly be hard pressed to NOT draw haunting parallels to the repressive techniques of China’s unity campaigns.
So, the book is interesting and compelling. However, as the book went on, I was dismayed that it didn’t hit these things.
It’s discussion of AI exhibited more than a little of a Frankenstein Complex, assuming that AI was going to evolve to exert control, whether anyone directed it to or not.
Interesting, compelling, myopic, or biased
Se ha producido un error. Vuelve a intentarlo dentro de unos minutos.