Excellent work

easy to follow the arguments, even if you don't know much physics, even in this audio version.

You voted on this review!

You reported this review!

good story, uneven narration

great story. good introduction to fascinating topics in physics, cosmology, math and philosophy to guide deeper investigations. the narrator is quite animated and on the whole engaging. however he has an odd habit of reading any quote with a very exaggerated, almost cartoonish voice which in many cases comes off as disrespectful to the party being quoted. some may enjoy it.. I found it off-putting as the book went on.

You voted on this review!

You reported this review!

4 people found this helpful

Good overview from the viewpoint of a mathematian

Prof Marcus du Sautoy gives an excellent review of how mathematics can help us understand universe. It is worthwhile hearing the story from the point-of-view of a mathematian. The author traces several important mathematical concepts through history, which is an amazing story. I learned a great deal from the book, and I highly recommend it.

Unfortunately, Prof. du Sautoy is not a physicist and he struggles with his explaination of quantum physics and relativity. For example, he falsely states that General Relativity (GR) is required to describe the motion of an accelerating reference system. GR describes gravity through an equivalence principal that relates gravity to an accelerating reference frame. He also gives a wrong explanation of the so called "twin paradox." Twins who take different paths through spacetime will experience different elapsed times because they change reference frames, not because one twin accelerates at a turnaround point. Both of these errors are common misconceptions. Prof du Sautoy should have asked a physicist to review his book.

You voted on this review!

You reported this review!

2 people found this helpful

Interesting Good book.

Well read by author himself.
Stories of scientists and their struggles/triumphs
over history are surprising and in some cases shocking.

Puts human face on very intelligent men and women.
Delves deep into the mysterious questions that plague
us to this day.

I have listen to it several times already just to begin take it all in.


Thx:-)

You voted on this review!

You reported this review!

The author being the narrator is great.

The author is a brilliant man and hearing the narration of the book by him is pretty amazing.

You voted on this review!

You reported this review!

Hit the Spot

Satisfied my fix for the frontiers of physics and cosmology. Explained a few topics more clearly than all the muddled attempts I've encountered.

I had to get used to his (Irish?) accent, which didn't take long.

I enjoyed his mathematical perspective, noting that he took a lot at face value, simply repeating the usual fare, which a novice reader will not notice or mind. I enjoyed his math jokes.

He inserted far, far too much God and religion - the book could have done without it. If he's going for the Templeton Prize, I'll forgive him (it is a whopper).

You voted on this review!

You reported this review!

Science Museum in a Book (this is a compliment :)

Any additional comments?

Under another publisher this book is titled "What We Cannot Know". This speaks to the philosophizing at the end of the book, where Du Sautoy summarizes his thoughts on the "Seven Journeys" mentioned in the alternate title. This alternate title better reflects the broader character of the book - like a walk through a science museum, the reader is generally left to explore and make up his or her own mind as we encounter Du Sautoy's seven topics: Chaos, Matter, Quantum Physics, the Universe, Time, Consciousness, and Infinity.

This is where Du Sautoy shines - you can practically see him in the inevitable BBC documentary pointing out lab equipment and sipping tea as he visits enlightened colleagues. If you love this kind of stuff - science museums and BBC or PBS documentaries - you'll love this book. There are even some cutting edge surprises here: Rovelli's Thermal Time and Tononi's Integrated Information Theory are two standouts I found myself researching further after Du Sautoy's mentions.

So, what of this overall "What We Cannot Know" thesis? Du Sautoy saves most of this discussion for the final chapter, which is largely too short for a rigorous philosophical treatment. As is right for a mathematician, he invokes Gödel's incompleteness theorems, mentions Alonzo Church, and generally hedges his bets. Interestingly, where Du Sautoy feels eggshells beneath his feet the most is at the "small" end of the spectrum, briefly mentioning the limitation of Plank length, whereas I found myself feeling very solid about our collective ability to discover further and further fundamentals of Quanta and Matter, but less sure about our future understanding of the Universe and Infinity. This is a good feeling at the end of a science and philosophy-of-science book, when you are confident to be slightly at odds with the author, while having thoroughly enjoyed the ride.

On final note: having recently completed a History of Science: 1700 to 1900 by Frederick Gregory, I can tell you these two books are excellent back-to-back reads. For all we can and cannot know, I can at least say that with certainty ;)

You voted on this review!

You reported this review!

14 people found this helpful

Broad but not insightful, written like a blog post

Sautoy brings together a vast array of topics that challenge current understanding about the universe, logic/mathematics, and consciousness. Although there is a good variety of topics, none of them is explored in depth to truly understand the issue at heart.

For example, in the section about quantum mechanics, Sautou casually mentions that "non-commutativity leads to uncertainty" and does nothing to justify the statement, even though only those familiar with the uncertainty principle could make sense of what was said...which is strange since this book is presumably an introduction to such topics.

Moreover, Sautoy presents many philosophically questionable and emotionally motivated views of religion and God. Although he is not openly hostile to belief, he has a condescending view of "traditional religion" and ends the book defining God as "what we cannot know."

This would be fine, but Sautou himself states in the book why this could be problematic, but simply dismisses the objections to his idea of God as nonsensical rather than actually addressing the objections in a meaningful manner--the same problem with all the other topics in the book.

Overall, the book, although superficially interesting, is written as if it were a combination of several interrelated op-eds containing his thoughts and opinions on various topics he considers grand and deceptively labeled what we cannot know.

The book should be titled "What I as Marcus Sautoy do not know and what I think about it, and also here's my idea of God, it's pretty cool"

You voted on this review!

You reported this review!

2 people found this helpful

A nice journey through the history os science

A longitudinal and transversal review of all of science. Marcus being the Professor for the Public Understanding of Science, does a good job at that. He goes a little wider and a little deeper than most science divulging treatises I've read so far, with quite a few interesting things I didn't know. A god read if you are a science buff

You voted on this review!

You reported this review!

1 person found this helpful

Narration Was Awful!

What would have made The Great Unknown better?

Marcus du Sautoy narrates his own books and his voice was awful. He has an extremely nasally voice. It was the opposite of calm and soothing like an audio book is supposed to be. I could not pay attention to the story. I stopped listening after one chapter, because his voice was so bad. It sucks because it sounded like an interesting topic.

Moral of the story- DO NOT NARRATE YOUR OWN BOOKS! Pay a professional to do it.

If you’ve listened to books by Marcus du Sautoy before, how does this one compare?

I have not listened to previous books by this author

Who would you have cast as narrator instead of Marcus du Sautoy?

Anybody but the author.

If you could play editor, what scene or scenes would you have cut from The Great Unknown?

I would cut Marcus du Sautoy from doing the narration

You voted on this review!

You reported this review!

1 person found this helpful