exceptionally well narrated

the story is repetitive but the narrator, also the author was so passionate about subject matter, I couldn't stop listening to this even if the stories are so dire, depressing. there's no happy ending, a lot of injustices, a lot of cruel fate and unfairness but this was in 1920s to 1930s, all of them if alive then are long dead. but their legacies survived, and that insidious radium glow. it is a frightening story, especially in the beginning when everyone was so jolly but you and I know in retrospect what radium is and I felt such dread. the companies were inhumane and frankly none of them had any real justice. kudos to the author for how she narrated her own book, complete with her own quirky pronunciation. she was the reason I follow this story intently and finished it. if not, I would have stopped because the stories are so depressing. and Google the pictures. all these brave women forced into the position of championing workers rights when all they wanted was a steady income, a family, children and ripe old age. the companies robbed them of these basic right, even the most precious commodity, time. such a cruel fate. highly recommended, especially audible version.

You voted on this review!

You reported this review!

A wonderful, horrible history

This is a truly fascinating story of human courage. I had never heard of The Radium Girls before I read this book. During listening, I went and checked all of my antique clocks. I needed to make sure none of them had radium dials.

You need to hear this story.
You need to face the horrors of workers from a different era.

Loved it.

You voted on this review!

You reported this review!

The radium girls deserve a better book

This book could have been cut by two thirds. Overly sentimental and repetitive. There are podcasts that to the story much better justice than this book and in 1/10th of the time. I feel sorry for the narrator who had to go through it in its entirety. I give it two stars because it's a story people should know, but it really only deserves one.

You voted on this review!

You reported this review!

While this is a story that needed to be told…

…it needed to be told in half the time. One problem is that the author follows too many characters who she tries to flesh out.

Therein lies the second problem. While I love narrative nonfiction, with this book I think she used too many fictional techniques in trying to bring the characters to life. I thought over and over that there was no way the author could know X. She’s in a person’s head describing thoughts and feelings she couldn’t know. She’s in a closed room, describing actions nobody saw. For example (this isn’t direct from the book, but it is representative of a scene in the book): Dr so-and-so stood in his empty office. He was grumbling as he dug through his messy desk drawer looking for an X-ray. Once again, he wished he were more organized and felt like a failure in the organization department. He ran his hand through his black hair, slicked back with hair pomade, scowled at the greas on the palm of his hand, wiped it off on his brown tie, and said, “Now where did I put that x-ray?” and continued to dig.

While I understand the author used original source material, examples like the above run rampant throughout the book. Are we to believe that material exists from the 1920s where we know what the doctor, alone in his office, was doing, thinking, feeling, wearing? I think not. She does this with about every single character--and like I said, there are a ton of people in the book.

Also, many repetitive gruesome descriptions of what happened to “the girls.” Had I been reading, I would have skimmed. Just a ton of repetition in general.

The author (English) narrates her own book and did a very nice job. It’s usually a disaster when novelists read their own fiction, but it seems nonfiction writers are much better at reading their memoir or nonfiction.

You voted on this review!

You reported this review!

8 people found this helpful