The Science of Can and Can't Audiolibro Por Chiara Marletto arte de portada

The Science of Can and Can't

A Physicist's Journey Through the Land of Counterfactuals

 Vista previa
OFERTA POR TIEMPO LIMITADO

3 meses gratis
Prueba por $0.00
La oferta termina el 31 de julio, 2025 a las 11:59PM PT.
Elige 1 audiolibro al mes de nuestra colección inigualable.
Escucha todo lo que quieras de entre miles de audiolibros, Originals y podcasts incluidos.
Accede a ofertas y descuentos exclusivos.
Premium Plus se renueva automáticamente por $14.95/mes después de 3 meses. Cancela en cualquier momento.

The Science of Can and Can't

De: Chiara Marletto
Narrado por: Katharine Lee McEwan
Prueba por $0.00

$0.00/mes despues de 3 meses. La oferta termina el 31 de julio, 2025 a las 11:59PM PT. Cancela en cualquier momento.

Compra ahora por $15.75

Compra ahora por $15.75

Confirma la compra
la tarjeta con terminación
Cambiar método de pago
Al confirmar tu compra, aceptas las Condiciones de Uso de Audible y el Aviso de Privacidad de Amazon. Impuestos a cobrar según aplique.
Cancelar

A luminous guide to how the radical new science of counterfactuals can reveal that the scope of the universe is greater, and more beautiful, than we ever imagined

There is a vast class of things that science has so far almost entirely neglected. They are central to the understanding of physical reality both at an everyday level and at the level of the most fundamental phenomena in physics, yet have traditionally been assumed to be impossible to incorporate into fundamental scientific explanations. They are facts not about what is (the actual) but about what could be (counterfactuals).

According to physicist Chiara Marletto, laws about things being possible or impossible may generate an alternative way of providing explanations. This fascinating, far-reaching approach holds promise for revolutionizing the way fundamental physics is formulated and for providing essential tools to face existing technological challenges - from delivering the next generation of information-processing devices beyond the universal quantum computer to designing AIs.

Each chapter in the book delineates how an existing vexed open problem in science can be solved by this radically different approach and it is augmented by short fictional stories that explicate the main point of the chapter. As Marletto demonstrates, contemplating what is possible can give us a more complete and hopeful picture of the physical world.

©2021 Chiara Marletto (P)2021 Penguin Audio Ciencia Filosofía Física Historia y Filosofía Inspirador Matemáticas

Reseñas de la Crítica

“Marletto's call to probe counterfactuals is novel and interesting.... Replete with stories from classical Greek mythology and examples of ideas drawn from biology and physics, The Science of Can and Can't is worth delving into.” (Wall Street Journal)

“[A] revolutionary recasting of physics.... Marletto’s contributions to ‘constructor theory’ reconcile what we think of as physical laws with the open-ended possibilities thrown up by biology and information theory. It is a paradigm that, for all its rigor, re-enchants the world and enriches our place in it.” (New Scientist)

“[A] cerebral yet intellectually satisfying journey with a simple description of the two kinds of counterfactuals in physics.... Marletto’s style resembles a frank conversation with the reader. Sophisticated concepts in physics, like information and knowledge, are explained using clear analogies to everyday life.” (Booklist)

Las personas que vieron esto también vieron:

The Fabric of Reality Audiolibro Por David Deutsch arte de portada
The Fabric of Reality De: David Deutsch
Todas las estrellas
Más relevante  
Very good attempt at explaining in simple language an abstract topic. In my own experience of teaching science and in particular the concept of information, I’ve struggled to find simple satisfying explanation. Dr Marletto has hit the mark I think here.
The book opens up a lot of topics to follow up on in modern science and especially the science of knowledge and creativity. She discusses the possibility of exploration of these ideas without resorting to references to dualistic and subjective ideas.
I highly recommend this book. But take the time to understand the concepts and definitions as you take the journey

Interesting introduction to science of counterfactuals

Se ha producido un error. Vuelve a intentarlo dentro de unos minutos.
The Science of Can and Can't by Chiara Marletto received great press when it was first released and I had high expectations for this book. However, I felt the author was unsure who her audience was. Was it the physical science community or the educated by non-technically schooled public?

As scientifically educated but not in the physical sciences, I found that her explanation of counter-factuals, the point of the book, to be opaque and at the same time overly general. Her attempts to use metaphors from the biological sciences were not drawn from current understandings.

I was disappointed in this book and can not recommend it for those of us who are looking for a better understanding of the physical world.

Catchy Concept But Not Well Described

Se ha producido un error. Vuelve a intentarlo dentro de unos minutos.
Constructor theory is really ambitious, it seeks to create a unified narrative that gets us beyond mind body duality, and wrap up biological, quantum, computational and mental pictures the world into a single physical framework. I have no doubt that this is the future, and people in the 23rd and 22nd centuries will discuss things in these terms laid out in this book. Also I think what she has done will be part of that. However, the author works too hard to present a pretty picture without error, and so necessarily doesn't offer the listener as much diving in as we would like.
The book is pretty, it has this traditional Japanese feel, of powerful simple expressions and artistic stories alongside. But as important as this topic is and as brilliant as I feel the author is, I wish she would have thrown out on the pages more of the gory mess that a subject this young must exist in, not be afraid to make a fool of herself asking more questions and presenting quandaries. The theory is a baby giant, there are going to be messes that need to be cleaned up.
Still, I recommend reading, the ultimate subject is awesome.

Foundational philosophy for modern science.

Se ha producido un error. Vuelve a intentarlo dentro de unos minutos.
The book introduces some important new ideas that are well worth listening to, but the voice reading these ideas is so monotonous as to induce either sleep or nausea, depending on your level of interest. A purely computer-generated voice of the same timbre, quality and accent would be easier to listen to than this. At least then one wouldn’t expect it to have some comprehension of the words it is voicing.

Why are good readings so rare?

Se ha producido un error. Vuelve a intentarlo dentro de unos minutos.
I enjoyed this book very much. I enjoyed the stories and the new ideas. Enjoy!

Very good, recommended for everyone!

Se ha producido un error. Vuelve a intentarlo dentro de unos minutos.
So everything is energy and energy is information. Energy cant never be fully lost, only exchanged.

Science porn.

Se ha producido un error. Vuelve a intentarlo dentro de unos minutos.
Narrator voice and style was too drone like. Inflections of intonation help to keep the listening active instead of falling into a lull.

drone performance

Se ha producido un error. Vuelve a intentarlo dentro de unos minutos.
I was hoping for the profound but instead got a puddle.

I confess I didn't get past the first chapter. Perhaps the book improves but given the surprising lack of thought in the opening pages, I saw little promise in going forward. If a scientist, from whom one should expect careful thought, presents such haphazard reasoning right from the start, what surety is there that things will improve?

Here is the first example: in chapter one, Marletto introduces the concept of "resilience." In a universe where entropy rules, there are things that resist decay. These are at least temporarily "resilient." To illustrate, he compares DNA to a rock. DNA has essentially remained unchanged for billions of years. Rocks erode. Ergo rocks aren't resilient, DNA is. However, DNA is a constituent part of a greater whole. Rocks are a greater whole of constituent parts. Okay, this is a minor point. But wouldn't it have been more consistent to say the components of a rock, the iron, the granite, etc. are unchanged over billions of years, but rocks erode? The DNA/rock illustration is just sloppy.

Secondly, Marletto presents a theory as fact and then bases his theory on this "fact." This is not science. It is belief. He states emphatically, "there is no (ultimate) designer." Maybe there is, maybe there isn't. I don't claim to know. Regardless, you can't prove a negative. You and I might agree that there is/is not designer, that the preponderance of evidence leans overwhelmingly in one direction or the other. However, this is still belief. Far better would have been if Marletto had simply ignored this "belief" and proceeded with his theory. Instead, he begins with sloppy thinking which portends little hope of improvement.

Was Hoping for Depth

Se ha producido un error. Vuelve a intentarlo dentro de unos minutos.
This book appears to be addressed to a popular audience, and yet claims to present a novel formulation of science, as if the concepts of impossibility and thought experiments were not quite central to canonical treatments.
I could waste no more time after the chapter on work and heat. The author seems to misunderstand Boltzmann’s conception of entropy as proportional to the logarithm of the number of micro states corresponding to a known macro state. The missing details in the latter are not “forgotten“ nor do we pretend to have forgotten them, but entropy is related to available information in profound ways that she apparently fails to grasp.

Straw-man critique breaks no new theoretical ground

Se ha producido un error. Vuelve a intentarlo dentro de unos minutos.
I was thrilled to listen to this book: the glowing reviews, the mention at the WSJ. And I did listen to 3/4 of it, until giving up. The mish-mash of disconnected stories just killed my interest, despite believing the topic is interesting and in the forefront of physics research.

an interesting concept, diluted beyond repair

Se ha producido un error. Vuelve a intentarlo dentro de unos minutos.
Ver más opiniones