
Theories of Knowledge: How to Think About What You Know
No se pudo agregar al carrito
Add to Cart failed.
Error al Agregar a Lista de Deseos.
Error al eliminar de la lista de deseos.
Error al añadir a tu biblioteca
Error al seguir el podcast
Error al dejar de seguir el podcast
3 meses gratis
Compra ahora por $33.90
No default payment method selected.
We are sorry. We are not allowed to sell this product with the selected payment method
-
Narrado por:
-
Joseph H. Shieber
Humans have been attempting to understand for thousands of years what knowledge truly is and how we aquire it, but the more we learn about the human body, our brains, and the world around us, the more challenging the quest becomes. The 21st century is a fast-paced world of technological change and expanding social networks, a world where information is plentiful and cheap, but where truth is in short supply.
When it comes to our never-ending search for the truth about knowledge, there are innumerable questions and considerations. What is the best way to make a transformative decision, such as whether to have a child? What if common sense was diametrically opposed to rational decision theory? If you see the correct time on a stopped clock, do you really know what time it is? Is that genuine knowledge or simply chance? And does the distinction matter?
Our memories are one of our primary channels for knowledge, but much of what we “remember” is actually false memories or confabulations. Where does that leave us?
The above questions merely scratch the surface of “epistemology”, the philosophical term for our inquiry into knowledge: what it is, the ways we acquire it, and how we justify our beliefs as knowledge. Delve into this exciting field in Theories of Knowledge: How to Think About What You Know. Taught by acclaimed Professor Joseph H. Shieber of Lafayette College, these 24 mind-bending lectures take you from ancient philosophers to contemporary neurobiologists, and from wide-ranging social networks to the deepest recesses of your own brain.
Epistemology is as old as philosophy itself. Your survey takes you back to Plato, who defined knowledge in terms of “true belief” - a personal belief that corresponds with some external truth. You’ll see how this relationship between knowledge, belief, and the truth aligns with what 20th-century developmental psychologists have learned about children and the way we first begin to access information.
These types of connections - between philosophical history and our world today, and between abstract theory and observed, real-world examples - make this course a rare treat, transforming how you think about yourself, the world around you, and the very nature of reality.
PLEASE NOTE: When you purchase this title, the accompanying PDF will be available in your Audible Library along with the audio.
©2019 The Great Courses (P)2019 The Teaching Company, LLCListeners also enjoyed...




















Las personas que vieron esto también vieron:


















Absorbing, but not if you are distracted
Se ha producido un error. Vuelve a intentarlo dentro de unos minutos.
interesting but very biased
Se ha producido un error. Vuelve a intentarlo dentro de unos minutos.
Great topic, but hard to keep up
Se ha producido un error. Vuelve a intentarlo dentro de unos minutos.
I enjoyed this very much
Se ha producido un error. Vuelve a intentarlo dentro de unos minutos.
Professor has poor delivery
Se ha producido un error. Vuelve a intentarlo dentro de unos minutos.
Practical Jargon!! Unbelievable!
Se ha producido un error. Vuelve a intentarlo dentro de unos minutos.
Little depth of knowledge, not understanding of spiritual knowledge or faith.
Seems he was selling another course.
Shallow
Se ha producido un error. Vuelve a intentarlo dentro de unos minutos.
Should be named "Naval Gazing"
Se ha producido un error. Vuelve a intentarlo dentro de unos minutos.
Then describes Descartes internalist philosophy by saying he cannot trust to his senses, but his doubt of those senses is an internal state, which he can build on: “Dubito Ergo Sum”, although he puts it in the more known version of “I think therefore I am.”
Then he proceeds to attempt to invalidate internalism by constructing an argument, where he adds to internal states other states that simply fit his understanding of the word internal, but have nothing to do with Descartes, later he carefully selects out of those one to disprove, which he further limits and limits until he gets to claim that the internal state is produced by vision and if we doubt ability to see what is there, then we have to doubt our internal senses. Adds the traditional Gorilla experiment and voila ... Descartes and Internalism disproved through a complete non-sequitur.
The irony is so big that just like the Gorilla it is completely ignored by all who look at it.
Prof. Shieber murders logic...
Se ha producido un error. Vuelve a intentarlo dentro de unos minutos.
i dont know nothing new
Se ha producido un error. Vuelve a intentarlo dentro de unos minutos.