Freakonomics Radio

By: Freakonomics Radio + Stitcher
  • Summary

  • Freakonomics co-author Stephen J. Dubner uncovers the hidden side of everything. Why is it safer to fly in an airplane than drive a car? How do we decide whom to marry? Why is the media so full of bad news? Also: things you never knew you wanted to know about wolves, bananas, pollution, search engines, and the quirks of human behavior. To get every show in our network without ads and a monthly bonus episode of Freakonomics Radio, sign up for SiriusXM Podcasts+ on Apple Podcasts at http://apple.co/SiriusXM.
    2024 Dubner Productions and Stitcher
    Show more Show less
activate_Holiday_promo_in_buybox_DT_T2
Episodes
  • 617. Are You Really Allergic to Penicillin?
    Jan 10 2025

    Like tens of millions of people, Stephen Dubner thought he had a penicillin allergy. Like the vast majority, he didn’t. This misdiagnosis costs billions of dollars and causes serious health problems, so why hasn’t it been fixed? And how about all the other things we think we’re allergic to?

    • SOURCES:
      • Kimberly Blumenthal, allergist-immunologist and researcher at Mass General Hospital and Harvard Medical School.
      • Theresa MacPhail, associate professor of science and technology studies at Stevens Institute of Technology.
      • Thomas Platts-Mills, professor of medicine at the University of Virginia.
      • Elena Resnick, allergist and immunologist at Mount Sinai Hospital.

    • RESOURCES:
      • Allergic: Our Irritated Bodies in a Changing World, by Theresa MacPhail (2023).
      • "Evaluation and Management of Penicillin Allergy: A Review," by Erica S. Shenoy, Eric Macy, and Theresa Rowe (JAMA, 2019).
      • "The Allergy Epidemics: 1870–2010," by Thomas Platts-Mills (The Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology, 2016).
      • "Randomized Trial of Peanut Consumption in Infants at Risk for Peanut Allergy," by George Du Toit, Graham Roberts, et al. (The New England Journal of Medicine, 2015).

    • EXTRAS:
      • Freakonomics, M.D.
    Show more Show less
    1 hr and 4 mins
  • Highway Signs and Prison Labor
    Jan 6 2025

    Incarcerated people grow crops, fight wildfires, and manufacture everything from prescription glasses to highway signs — often for pennies an hour. Zachary Crockett takes the next exit, in this special episode of The Economics of Everyday Things.

    • SOURCES:
      • Laura Appleman, professor of law at Willamette University.
      • Christopher Barnes, inmate at the Franklin Correctional Center.
      • Lee Blackman, general manager at Correction Enterprises.
      • Gene Hawkins, senior principal engineer at Kittelson and professor emeritus of civil engineering at Texas A&M University.
      • Renee Roach, state signing and delineation engineer for the North Carolina Department of Transportation.
      • Brian Scott, ex-inmate, former worker at the Correction Enterprises printing plant.
      • Louis Southall, warden of Franklin Correctional Center.

    • RESOURCES:
      • “Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices for Streets and Highways, 11th Edition,” by the U.S. Department of Transportation Federal Highway Administration (2023).
      • “Prisoners in the U.S. Are Part of a Hidden Workforce Linked to Hundreds of Popular Food Brands,” by Robin McDowell and Margie Mason (AP News, 2024).
      • “Ex-Prisoners Face Headwinds as Job Seekers, Even as Openings Abound,” by Talmon Joseph Smith (The New York Times, 2023).
      • “Bloody Lucre: Carceral Labor and Prison Profit,” by Laura Appleman (Wisconsin Law Review, 2022).
      • “The Road to Clarity,” by Joshua Yaffa (The New York Times Magazine, 2007).
      • Correction Enterprises.

    • EXTRAS:
      • “Do People Pay Attention to Signs?” by No Stupid Questions (2022).
      • The Economics of Everyday Things.
    Show more Show less
    39 mins
  • Can Academic Fraud Be Stopped? (Update)
    Jan 2 2025

    Probably not — the incentives are too strong. But a few reformers are trying. We check in on their progress, in an update to an episode originally published last year. (Part 2 of 2)

    • SOURCES:
      • Max Bazerman, professor of business administration at Harvard Business School.
      • Leif Nelson, professor of business administration at the University of California, Berkeley Haas School of Business.
      • Brian Nosek, professor of psychology at the University of Virginia and executive director at the Center for Open Science.
      • Ivan Oransky, distinguished journalist-in-residence at New York University, editor-in-chief of The Transmitter, and co-founder of Retraction Watch.
      • Joseph Simmons, professor of applied statistics and operations, information, and decisions at the Wharton School at the University of Pennsylvania.
      • Uri Simonsohn, professor of behavioral science at Esade Business School.
      • Simine Vazire, professor of psychology at the University of Melbourne and editor-in-chief of Psychological Science.

    • RESOURCES:
      • "How a Scientific Dispute Spiralled Into a Defamation Lawsuit," by Gideon Lewis-Kraus (The New Yorker, 2024).
      • "The Harvard Professor and the Bloggers," by Noam Scheiber (The New York Times, 2023).
      • "They Studied Dishonesty. Was Their Work a Lie?" by Gideon Lewis-Kraus (The New Yorker, 2023).
      • "Evolving Patterns of Extremely Productive Publishing Behavior Across Science," by John P.A. Ioannidis, Thomas A. Collins, and Jeroen Baas (bioRxiv, 2023).
      • "Hindawi Reveals Process for Retracting More Than 8,000 Paper Mill Articles," (Retraction Watch, 2023).
      • "Exclusive: Russian Site Says It Has Brokered Authorships for More Than 10,000 Researchers," (Retraction Watch, 2019).
      • "How Many Scientists Fabricate and Falsify Research? A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Survey Data," by Daniele Fanelli (PLOS One, 2009).
      • Lifecycle Journal.

    • EXTRAS:
      • "Why Is There So Much Fraud in Academia? (Update)" by Freakonomics Radio (2024).
      • "Freakonomics Goes to College, Part 1," by Freakonomics Radio (2012).
    Show more Show less
    1 hr and 9 mins

What listeners say about Freakonomics Radio

Average customer ratings
Overall
  • 4.5 out of 5 stars
  • 5 Stars
    25
  • 4 Stars
    3
  • 3 Stars
    1
  • 2 Stars
    0
  • 1 Stars
    1
Performance
  • 5 out of 5 stars
  • 5 Stars
    27
  • 4 Stars
    2
  • 3 Stars
    0
  • 2 Stars
    0
  • 1 Stars
    1
Story
  • 4.5 out of 5 stars
  • 5 Stars
    25
  • 4 Stars
    2
  • 3 Stars
    2
  • 2 Stars
    0
  • 1 Stars
    1

Reviews - Please select the tabs below to change the source of reviews.

Sort by:
Filter by:
  • Overall
    5 out of 5 stars
  • Performance
    5 out of 5 stars
  • Story
    5 out of 5 stars

A general knowledge lover's goldmine

To put simply, I've recommended the podcast to almost everyone I know, and they love it.

Something went wrong. Please try again in a few minutes.

You voted on this review!

You reported this review!

1 person found this helpful

  • Overall
    5 out of 5 stars
  • Performance
    5 out of 5 stars
  • Story
    5 out of 5 stars

Brilliant

Balanced, informed and entertaining. I love everything Freakonomics and NSQ. Easy to consume and well produced.

Something went wrong. Please try again in a few minutes.

You voted on this review!

You reported this review!

2 people found this helpful

  • Overall
    5 out of 5 stars
  • Performance
    5 out of 5 stars
  • Story
    5 out of 5 stars

Very Intresting

The episodes are very interesting. They make you think and also answer some interesting questions.

Something went wrong. Please try again in a few minutes.

You voted on this review!

You reported this review!

1 person found this helpful

  • Overall
    4 out of 5 stars
  • Performance
    5 out of 5 stars
  • Story
    3 out of 5 stars

Data driven but very left leaning

Data driven, which is good.
Left leaning to the point that most of the experts presenting the information skew the informations natural conclusion or the premise.

Something went wrong. Please try again in a few minutes.

You voted on this review!

You reported this review!

1 person found this helpful

  • Overall
    5 out of 5 stars
  • Performance
    5 out of 5 stars
  • Story
    5 out of 5 stars

Try it!

I recently found Freakenomics radio and really enjoy it. Contrary to other reviewers, I don’t feel it’s pushing a political agenda at all. It simply brings up random questions and tries to answer them with real data. My favorite episode so far is #514 with Roland Fryer. I found him very funny and interesting.

Something went wrong. Please try again in a few minutes.

You voted on this review!

You reported this review!

1 person found this helpful

  • Overall
    1 out of 5 stars
  • Performance
    1 out of 5 stars
  • Story
    1 out of 5 stars

Very biased

While the show is entertaining, it is extremely biased. I have never heard this show say anything bad about any Democrat. I don’t think they have ever give an authentic complement towards a republican. It seems like economists no longer consider all of the facts. They just consider the ones that matter to their agenda.

Something went wrong. Please try again in a few minutes.

You voted on this review!

You reported this review!