HistoTalks: NSH Podcasts

By: National Society for Histotechnology
  • Summary

  • Histology related podcasts brought to you by the National Society for Histotechnology
    Copyright 2016 . All rights reserved.
    Show more Show less
activate_Holiday_promo_in_buybox_DT_T2
Episodes
  • NSH Poster Podcast: P08/P11 (2024)
    Dec 7 2024
    P08-Diagnostic Cytopathology Cell Block Preparation Methods- Anna Patterson FIBMS MSc CSci Diagnostic Cytology Scheme Coordinator Helen Naylor MSc Diagnostic Cytology Technical Specialist

    Cell blocks from Cytopathology samples have always had value in the diagnostic process as a complement to the traditional Cytopathology stains – Papanicolaou and Romanowsky. This has become more important to provide material for Immunocytochemistry to refine malignant diagnosis, and more recently, for the use of molecular testing to aid in the choice of tailored chemotherapy regimens. If this information can be obtained from Cytopathology samples, which are less invasive than biopsy samples, the patient will benefit. A variety of preparation methods are available for the preparation of cell blocks from cells from Diagnostic Cytopathology samples. The most popular methods will be discussed and how they can be used to optimise the quality of cell preservation if used correctly. Information garnered from the results of the recently introduced UK NEQAS CPT Diagnostic Cytopathology Cell block scheme will be presented and how this information can be circulated to laboratories experiencing difficulties with their preparation methods as an advisory service. This will include. • Understanding the clinical importance and diagnostic purpose of correct procedures in Diagnostic Cytopathology Cell Block preparation. • Identifying and determining factors affecting best practice and quality in Diagnostic Cytopathology Cell Block practice and how to resolve them. • Identifying and understanding the causes of artefacts experienced in Diagnostic Cytopathology Cell Block preparation methods and how to eliminate and prevent them.

    P11- Participating In A Digital Diagnostic Cytopathology Interpretive Proficiency Testing (iEQA) Scheme -Helen Naylor, Anna Patterson, Chantell Hodgson, Ashley Makela

    The iLabXCell Digital Diagnostic Cytopathology Interpretive Proficiency Testing Scheme or iEQA is facilitated by UK NEQAS Cellular Pathology Technique (CPT), and is designed to promote quality, excellence, and education for all involved in screening and reporting of Diagnostic Cytopathology. It is open to medical and non-medical staff, trainees, advanced practitioners, and staff associated with Cytopathology. iEQA provides superior, outstanding, and representative case examples for individuals to examine in a remote setting and submit an opinion via the user-friendly digital platform. Offering 2 circulations annually it provides • Easy access for registration • Ability to choose specimen types • Advanced slide viewing • Clinical details to assist diagnoses • Categorisation of images using benign or malignant

    Flexibility Remote learning allows participants to continue learning alongside their peers, in an environment accommodating their needs. It allows the flexibility of international participants to access the platform at any time, convenient to them. Remote learning via the iEQA platform, offers the flexibility for users to pick up learning where they left it – anywhere, anytime, from any location. Self-paced learning Traditional learning has long failed to acknowledge the individualised nature of learning, opting instead for a generalised approach that may not be optimised for everyone. One of the many benefits of this iEQA is providing participants more independence to: • Spend more time on cases/case types they find difficult • Revisit the images as often as they need

    Environmental benefits Digitising slides has led to a decrease in physical resources previously necessary for iEQA to function. Everything participants need is accessible on-line, eliminating the historical environmental impact and the time taken for circulations to be distributed and completed.

    Future developments An on-line educational image library, containing images of Diagnostic Cytopathology cases of urines, serous fluids, respiratory and head and neck cases used in previous circulations for educational and training purposes.

    Show more Show less
    6 mins
  • NSH Poster Podcast: P06/ P15 (2024)
    Dec 7 2024
    P06-Understanding the Quality of your Electron Microscopy Provider in this Era of Outsourcing of Services- Tracey de Haro MSc, FIBMS, UK NEQAS CPT TEM Scheme Coordinator Specialist Scientific Lead for Electron Microscopy University Hospitals Of Leicester NHS Trust, UK Background Electron Microscopy (EM) remains vital to the diagnostic repertoire for the diagnosis of pathologies. Surveys of diagnostic TEM units in the UK were carried out in 2012, in 2019 (unpublished) and is currently being repeated. These surveys showed that a large amount of EM is now outsourced to units away from the originating trust. Whether UK or globally, when pathology departments are looking for a supplier of diagnostic EM services, the only questions they ask of the EM units are “how much does it cost” and “what is your turnaround time?” Are these the only relevant questions to ask? Considerations The following relevant issues should be considered alongside cost and speed; The technical quality of an electron microscopy service; Can the EM unit produce good quality sections and images that maximizes the chances of observing relevant pathologies? Data from UK NEQAS CPT show that only 50% of EM units participating in the diagnostic TEM scheme achieve excellent scores of 9 or 10 out of 102 not achieving excellent quality could potentially compromise a diagnosis. The knowledge the staff have of ultrastructural pathology • Do the staff assessing your samples know what to look for? Having proof of EM staff’s knowledge in ultrastructural pathology is essential when relying on them to provide relevant images and a considered report on features seen or not seen. Questions to Ask Your EM Provider To ensure that the EM service you are sending your samples to is ‘fit for purpose’, you should not only consider the speed and cost of the service but also; • Ensure that your potential provider is accredited to ISO 15189 standards. • Ask for evidence of participation in an EQA scheme specifically for technical TEM. • Ask for TEM EQA results over the past 12 months and ensure they are consistently achieving excellent marks. • Do the EM staff participate in regular knowledge and competence competency review specifically for TEM and ultrastructural assessment? • How much experience of ultrastructural pathology do the members of staff examining your samples have and do they have any qualifications in this area? • Get endorsements from other users of the EM service to evidence the quality of work offered. Summary Access to EM services remains vital across the globe, but in the UK is increasingly being outsourced to units remote from the originating trust. In this case, the pathologist is reliant on the images and ultrastructural report being accurate to inform diagnosis. To ensure accuracy, the EM unit, whether they be UK based or part of our international community, all should participate in a quality EQA scheme and all staff should be experienced and have access to training to ensure they are educated to a high level in ultrastructural pathology. Without this, the referring trust cannot be guaranteed the service they are paying for is fit for purpose. P15-Understanding the Quality of your Electron Microscopy Provider in this Era of Outsourcing of Services: How does a Technical EQA Scheme Add Value? -Tracey de Haro MSc, FIBMS, UK NEQAS CPT TEM Scheme Coordinator Specialist Scientific Lead for Electron Microscopy University Hospitals Of Leicester NHS Trust, UK Background Benefit of Participation in an EQA Scheme Summary The Transmission Electron Microscopy (TEM) Scheme was developed in 2018 as a means of assessing the quality of the final output of diagnostic TEM Units against a defined assessment standard. The aim of this EQA scheme is to allow EM units to have their work regularly assessed and measured against other TEM units in an anonymous and supportive manner. This ensures that results are reliable and comparable no matter where they are performed. Education in technical aspects of the TEM process is also offered as a knowledge and competence exercise as part of each EQA assessment. EQY Scheme Organization TEM scheme Participants are asked to submit 4 digital images from each of 2 contrasted TEM cases. There are 6 EQA assessment runs per year. Specific tissue types for each case are requested for each assessment run. Renal cases are requested for each run as case 1 and muscle or nerve are requested in rotation for case 2. However alternative tissue types can be submitted for either case if participants do not examine those tissue types. Details of technical fixation, processing and imaging for each case are required to be submitted as part of Data Entry. This allows generation of ‘best method’ reports for high achieving EQA scores to be issued to Participants. Each image is anonymously assessed against the defined assessment criteria by a pair of expert peer assessors. Each assessor will award a score ...
    Show more Show less
    7 mins
  • NSH Poster Podcast: P37 (2024)
    Dec 7 2024

    Research Requires Flexibility: Protease-Free Permeabilization Expands FISH Tissue Applications.-Andrelie Branicky, Shared Laboratory Resources, Lerner Research Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH

    Fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) visualizes the presence of a specific DNA or RNA sequence in a tissue sample or cell. This method, particularly the mRNA version, detects gene expression when protein might not be present or IHC is impossible. FISH combined with immunohistochemistry enables spatial transcriptomics, which provides significantly more information about the tissue microenvironment.

    Formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded (FFPE) tissues are the standard for tissue preservation in the clinical world. Most commercial mRNA probe and amplification systems are built around the model of FFPE tissue that can withstand harsh protease permeabilization. In the research world, tissues are fixed in different fixatives for varying times; all at the discretion of the investigator instead of an organization like the CLIA.

    Given the wide range of tissue preparations, the HCR automated FISH-ISH protease-free program provides the flexibility to combine FISH and fluorescent immunohistochemistry on tissue fixed in a variety of ways such as: 10% NBF, Histochoice (a glyoxal-based fixative), and methanol/acetic acid, with only minor changes to the basic protocol. Additionally, the lack of harsh protease pre-treatment maintains tissue integrity and morphology for staining and imaging.

    Show more Show less
    4 mins

What listeners say about HistoTalks: NSH Podcasts

Average customer ratings

Reviews - Please select the tabs below to change the source of reviews.