• Alec Baldwin Sues Over Alleged Malicious Prosecution in 'Rust' Case
    Jan 14 2025
    Actor Alec Baldwin has filed a civil lawsuit against Santa Fe District Attorney Mary Carmack-Altwies, Special Prosecutor Kari Morrissey, and other officials, claiming malicious prosecution and violations of his civil rights. The lawsuit follows the dismissal of criminal charges against Baldwin in connection with the 2021 death of cinematographer Halyna Hutchins on the set of Rust.

    Baldwin was holding a prop pistol during a rehearsal when it discharged, killing Hutchins and wounding director Joel Souza. Baldwin faced an involuntary manslaughter charge, which was thrown out in July by Judge Mary Marlowe Sommer. The judge cited prosecutorial misconduct, including the withholding of key evidence related to the live ammunition on set.

    The lawsuit, filed Thursday, names additional defendants, including investigators from the Santa Fe County Sheriff’s Office, the First Judicial District Attorney’s Office, the Santa Fe County Board of Commissioners, and the county itself.

    In the filing, Baldwin’s attorneys accuse prosecutors of engaging in a “malicious and unlawful” pursuit of the actor for political and personal reasons. “Criminal prosecutions are supposed to be about the search for truth and justice, not to pursue personal or political gain or harass the innocent,” attorneys Luke Nikas and Alex Spiro stated. “Kari Morrissey and the other defendants violated that basic principle, over and over, and trampled on Alec Baldwin’s rights. We bring this action to hold the defendants accountable for their misconduct and to prevent them from doing this to anyone else.”

    The lawsuit alleges that prosecutors intentionally concealed evidence that would have cleared Baldwin and instead sought to scapegoat him for Hutchins’ death. Special Prosecutor Andrea Reeb is accused of making statements about how pursuing the case could benefit her political career as a Republican state representative. Baldwin’s attorneys claim that false and incomplete testimony from Morrissey was used to secure his indictment.

    Responding to the lawsuit, Morrissey said, “In October 2023, the prosecution team became aware that Mr. Baldwin intended to file a retaliatory civil lawsuit. We look forward to our day in court.”

    The incident, which occurred during the filming of the Western Rust, reignited debates about firearms safety on film sets and led to multiple lawsuits, including Baldwin’s. The actor is seeking financial damages through a jury trial, arguing that the defendants must be held accountable for their actions.

    “Defendants must now be held accountable for their malicious and unlawful pursuit of Baldwin,” the complaint states.

    The tragic shooting of Halyna Hutchins has left a lasting impact on Hollywood, with many calling for stricter safety protocols. Baldwin’s lawsuit underscores broader concerns about the role of political influence and prosecutorial accountability in high-profile cases.

    #AlecBaldwin #RustLawsuit #HalynaHutchins #CivilRights #MaliciousProsecution #MovieSetSafety #Hollywood

    Want to listen to ALL of our podcasts AD-FREE? Subscribe through APPLE PODCASTS, and try it for three days free: https://tinyurl.com/ycw626tj
    Follow Our Other Cases: https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com
    The latest on The Downfall of Diddy, The Trial of Karen Read, The Murder Of Maddie Soto, Catching the Long Island Serial Killer, Awaiting Admission: BTK’s Unconfessed Crimes, Delphi Murders: Inside the Crime, Chad & Lori Daybell, The Murder of Ana Walshe, Alex Murdaugh, Bryan Kohberger, Lucy Letby, Kouri Richins, Malevolent Mormon Mommys, The Menendez Brothers: Quest For Justice, The Murder of Stephen Smith, The Murder of Madeline Kingsbury, The Murder Of Sandra Birchmore, and much more! Listen at https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com
    Show more Show less
    14 mins
  • Diddy’s Journey from Mount Vernon to Music Mogul Spotlighted in New Documentary
    Jan 14 2025
    A new Peacock documentary, Diddy: The Making of a Bad Boy, delves into the life of Sean “Diddy” Combs, offering fresh perspectives on his youth and rise to fame while confronting recent controversies surrounding the music icon.

    Tim Patterson, a childhood friend, painted a vivid picture of Diddy’s early years in Mount Vernon, New York. “I know Sean, not Diddy, not Daddy Love,” Patterson shared in the film. “I have to tell people about what they don’t know about his childhood.” He described young Sean as a wealthy outlier, often bullied due to his privileged background. “Sean was the different kid. People could smell he wasn’t tough,” he added.

    The documentary explores how Diddy’s father, Melvin Combs, was killed in what former bodyguard Gene Deal described as a retaliation for cooperating with law enforcement. This loss left Janice Combs, Diddy’s mother, to raise her children alone. Patterson explained that Janice’s inheritance allowed the family to move to a more affluent area, fostering a life of luxury for her son. “He was the one in the hat, with jewelry on, at four years old,” Patterson remarked about an old photo.

    Diddy’s childhood also involved exposure to lively, unconventional environments. “Sean’s house was the party spot,” Patterson recalled, citing wild gatherings that mirrored the flamboyant celebrations Diddy would later host as an adult. According to Lee Davis, a friend and DJ, “She made sure everybody was comfortable,” though Janice Combs did not comment on her portrayal in the documentary.

    The film highlights Diddy’s relentless ambition, which emerged during his time at Howard University. Ron Lawrence, a college classmate, noted that Diddy declared, “I’m gonna be the biggest record producer in the world.” His determination paid off after dropping out of college and securing an internship at Uptown Records in 1990. Patterson recalled, “He’d show up anywhere to get the bigwigs’ attention—even sleeping outside of Andre Harrell’s car.”

    Despite his success, Diddy’s legacy faces challenges. In September 2024, he was arrested on charges of sex trafficking, racketeering conspiracy, and transportation to engage in prostitution. He has pleaded not guilty to all charges, and his representatives vehemently deny the allegations. “This documentary recycles and perpetuates the same lies and conspiracy theories,” a spokesperson told Us Weekly, criticizing NBC and Peacock for amplifying what they view as baseless claims.

    The documentary premieres on Peacock on January 14, offering a multifaceted view of one of music’s most influential and polarizing figures. While it unearths stories of childhood resilience, ambition, and transformation, it also raises questions about the darker chapters of Diddy’s life.

    #SeanCombs #DiddyDocumentary #MountVernon #MusicMogul #Peacock #HipHopHistory #Controversy

    Want to listen to ALL of our podcasts AD-FREE? Subscribe through APPLE PODCASTS, and try it for three days free: https://tinyurl.com/ycw626tj
    Follow Our Other Cases: https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com
    The latest on The Downfall of Diddy, The Trial of Karen Read, The Murder Of Maddie Soto, Catching the Long Island Serial Killer, Awaiting Admission: BTK’s Unconfessed Crimes, Delphi Murders: Inside the Crime, Chad & Lori Daybell, The Murder of Ana Walshe, Alex Murdaugh, Bryan Kohberger, Lucy Letby, Kouri Richins, Malevolent Mormon Mommys, The Menendez Brothers: Quest For Justice, The Murder of Stephen Smith, The Murder of Madeline Kingsbury, The Murder Of Sandra Birchmore, and much more! Listen at https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com
    Show more Show less
    13 mins
  • Lori Daybell Takes the Reins in Arizona Court, Representing Herself in High-Profile Murder Trials
    Jan 13 2025
    Convicted murderer Lori Daybell returned to court Friday, asserting her right to represent herself in Arizona as she faces charges for the murder of her fourth husband, Charles Vallow, and the attempted murder of her niece’s ex-husband, Brandon Boudreaux.

    During the hearing in Phoenix, Daybell, already serving life sentences in Idaho for the murders of her two youngest children and her fifth husband’s first wife, stood firm in her decision to self-represent. She clarified to the court that she wishes to be addressed as Lori Daybell, using her fifth husband Chad Daybell’s last name. Chad Daybell was sentenced to death in Idaho for his role in the murders.

    Prosecutors are preparing for the first trial focusing on Charles Vallow’s murder, with jury selection scheduled for March 31. “The Defense intends on starting trial without delay,” Daybell told the court. Prosecutors anticipate their case-in-chief will take several weeks, depending on how long Daybell, acting as her own attorney, takes to cross-examine witnesses.

    Judge Justin Beresky acknowledged the complexity of scheduling, noting that a second trial date for the attempted murder of Boudreaux will depend on the duration of the first trial. “It’s hard to set the second one without knowing how long the first one’s going to take,” he said.

    Daybell made her presence felt in court, hand-filing two motions requesting additional discovery from prosecutors. One motion sought documents related to her extradition from Idaho to Arizona. Judge Beresky denied the motion, stating the materials were not relevant to the current charges.

    Despite these setbacks, Daybell appeared resolute. Her choice to represent herself, a rare and risky move in high-stakes criminal cases, has drawn significant public attention. Legal analysts have highlighted the challenges she will face, including navigating complex legal procedures and cross-examining witnesses.

    As her trial date approaches, Daybell’s courtroom maneuvers will undoubtedly remain under intense scrutiny. Her ability to present a coherent defense while grappling with the weight of public opinion and her criminal history may shape the outcome of these proceedings.

    #LoriDaybell #ArizonaTrial #CharlesVallow #BrandonBoudreaux #SelfRepresentation #TrueCrime #MurderTrial

    Want to listen to ALL of our podcasts AD-FREE? Subscribe through APPLE PODCASTS, and try it for three days free: https://tinyurl.com/ycw626tj
    Follow Our Other Cases: https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com
    The latest on The Downfall of Diddy, The Trial of Karen Read, The Murder Of Maddie Soto, Catching the Long Island Serial Killer, Awaiting Admission: BTK’s Unconfessed Crimes, Delphi Murders: Inside the Crime, Chad & Lori Daybell, The Murder of Ana Walshe, Alex Murdaugh, Bryan Kohberger, Lucy Letby, Kouri Richins, Malevolent Mormon Mommys, The Menendez Brothers: Quest For Justice, The Murder of Stephen Smith, The Murder of Madeline Kingsbury, The Murder Of Sandra Birchmore, and much more! Listen at https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com
    Show more Show less
    7 mins
  • Sheriff Marcos Lopez Added to Brady List Over Controversial Statements in Madeline Soto Case
    Jan 13 2025
    Osceola County Sheriff Marcos Lopez has been added to the Brady List by Andrew Bain, former Orange-Osceola state attorney, following conflicting statements Lopez made about a crime scene photo in the case of 13-year-old Madeline Soto. The Brady List is a tool used to notify legal parties when a witness’s credibility or truthfulness may be in doubt, potentially affecting court proceedings.

    In a December 30 letter, Bain informed Lopez of his inclusion on the list due to inconsistent explanations about a photo of Soto's body that was mistakenly posted on social media. The move could have significant implications for the death penalty case against Stephen Sterns, accused of Soto’s murder, where Lopez is listed as a witness.

    The controversy began in July 2024 when Bain warned Lopez that he might be added to the Brady List. Lopez initially told Kissimmee’s police chief and the public that the photo was posted by mistake, issuing an apology. However, during a radio interview with WDBO, Lopez stated, “As to the photo, there was an apology issued but it wasn’t actually the body, it was an area of interest where there was a body found. No one ever came out directly and said it was the victim.”

    Days later, in a sworn interview with the Florida Department of Law Enforcement, Lopez acknowledged having the photo sent to his phone to compare the clothing on the body with what Soto was last seen wearing. Bain flagged these discrepancies as problematic for Lopez’s credibility.

    In the December letter, Bain also criticized an internal memorandum from the Osceola Sheriff’s Office that exonerated Lopez, stating it lacked objectivity and bypassed formal investigative protocols. “Adopting the reading the Memo does in this case suggests the Osceola Sheriff’s Office does not care if an employee or member is truthful when answering questions outside the chain of command or, say, to the media. I cannot believe that is the case,” Bain wrote.

    Bain further argued that Lopez’s statement to WDBO appeared to downplay the incident and shift blame. He wrote, “To be clear, the concerning statement in your interview is your assertion that ‘[n]o one ever came out directly and said it [the photograph] was the victim.’ When viewed in this proper context, it is hard to read your immediate answer as anything but an attempt to claim the photo you posted was not the victim in an attempt to lessen your public responsibility for a violation of Florida public records laws.”

    In addition to being added to the Brady List, Lopez was fined $250 last month for violating Florida’s public records laws in connection with the photo’s disclosure. Bain emphasized that the conflicting statements could be used to impeach Lopez’s credibility as a witness in Sterns’ trial.

    The Osceola County Sheriff’s Office responded to Bain’s decision with a statement: “The Sheriff’s Office completely disagrees with Andrew Bain’s decision. The perspectives mentioned in his letter have no merit, and the Sheriff will be appealing his decision. No other statement is available at this time.”

    The Brady List designation places added scrutiny on Lopez and his role in the high-profile case. The decision also underscores ongoing concerns about accountability and transparency within law enforcement as Soto’s family seeks justice.

    #BradyList #AndrewBain #MarcosLopez #MadelineSoto #OsceolaSheriff #PublicRecords #FloridaLaw

    Want to listen to ALL of our podcasts AD-FREE? Subscribe through APPLE PODCASTS, and try it for three days free: https://tinyurl.com/ycw626tj
    Follow Our Other Cases: https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com
    The latest on The Downfall of Diddy, The Trial of Karen Read, The Murder Of Maddie Soto, Catching the Long Island Serial Killer, Awaiting Admission: BTK’s Unconfessed Crimes, Delphi Murders: Inside the Crime, Chad & Lori Daybell, The Murder of Ana Walshe, Alex Murdaugh, Bryan Kohberger, Lucy Letby, Kouri Richins, Malevolent Mormon Mommys, The Menendez Brothers: Quest For Justice, The Murder of Stephen Smith, The Murder of Madeline Kingsbury, The Murder Of Sandra Birchmore, and much more! Listen at https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com
    Show more Show less
    11 mins
  • Court Decision Upholds Use of Cellebrite Testimony Amid High-Profile Case Debate-What Does That Mean for Karen Read?
    Jan 10 2025
    The Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court’s recent decision has far-reaching implications for the Karen Read case and similar trials involving digital evidence. The court upheld David Cronin Jr.’s conviction for possession of child sex abuse materials, affirming that testimony on data extracted with Cellebrite software could be admitted without the witness being an expert.

    Cronin’s appeal rested on claims that Police Officer Michael McLaughlin, who testified on the Cellebrite report from Cronin’s phone, was not qualified to do so as an expert. McLaughlin admitted he lacked technical expertise but explained that Cellebrite’s software presented data in a layperson-friendly format. The court concluded that McLaughlin’s testimony “required no scientific, technical, or specialized knowledge,” making it admissible as lay testimony. However, the court also found parts of his testimony, such as claims about Cellebrite’s reliability, ventured into expert territory but ruled that this did not unfairly influence the trial’s outcome.

    This decision is particularly relevant to the Karen Read case, where Cellebrite plays a pivotal role. Read, accused of causing the death of her boyfriend, John O’Keefe, is building her defense around allegations that a prosecution witness, Jennifer McCabe, conducted suspicious Google searches. According to Read’s expert, Richard Green, McCabe searched phrases like “how long to die in cold” at 2:27 a.m., hours before O’Keefe’s body was found.

    Green, who reviewed Cellebrite data from McCabe’s phone, testified that the searches were in a “deleted state” and that several phone calls had been erased. However, prosecutors argue Green’s findings are flawed, citing their own Cellebrite expert, Ian Whiffin, who found no evidence of such searches or deletions. Additionally, Cellebrite software updates introduced after Read’s initial trial have reportedly invalidated the 2:27 a.m. timestamp central to Green’s claims.

    Prosecutors noted that Cellebrite’s new software update prevents manipulation of timestamp data and removes unreliable timestamps from Safari searches. When McCabe’s phone was re-analyzed with the updated version, the searches were shown to have occurred at 6:24 a.m., closer to when O’Keefe was found, and without evidence of deletion.

    The defense’s reliance on Green’s earlier analysis has led prosecutors to file a motion to bar him from testifying, asserting that his opinions are “completely discredited” by both Cellebrite and their own expert. They argue that presenting Green’s findings in court risks confusing jurors with inaccurate information.

    A hearing to determine the admissibility of Green’s testimony is scheduled for Jan. 31, a critical juncture in Read’s case as her team seeks to challenge the prosecution’s narrative.

    This latest legal development underscores the complexities of using Cellebrite software in criminal cases. As digital forensics evolves, courts continue to grapple with how best to evaluate and admit such evidence, setting significant precedents for future trials.

    #DigitalForensics #KarenReadCase #Cellebrite #LegalPrecedent #Massachusetts #CourtRuling #ExpertTestimony
    Want to listen to ALL of our podcasts AD-FREE? Subscribe through APPLE PODCASTS, and try it for three days free: https://tinyurl.com/ycw626tj
    Follow Our Other Cases: https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com
    The latest on The Downfall of Diddy, The Trial of Karen Read, The Murder Of Maddie Soto, Catching the Long Island Serial Killer, Awaiting Admission: BTK’s Unconfessed Crimes, Delphi Murders: Inside the Crime, Chad & Lori Daybell, The Murder of Ana Walshe, Alex Murdaugh, Bryan Kohberger, Lucy Letby, Kouri Richins, Malevolent Mormon Mommys, The Menendez Brothers: Quest For Justice, The Murder of Stephen Smith, The Murder of Madeline Kingsbury, The Murder Of Sandra Birchmore, and much more! Listen at https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com
    Show more Show less
    8 mins
  • Diddy Denies Rumors of Jealousy Toward Luigi Mangione Amid Shared Brooklyn Jail Stay
    Jan 10 2025
    Multiple reports emerged suggesting that Sean "Diddy" Combs, 55, is upset about the attention fellow inmate Luigi Mangione, 26, has been receiving at the Metropolitan Detention Center in Brooklyn. However, a source close to Diddy has denied these claims.

    “This story has been completely made up, and there is no truth [to] it,” the insider exclusively told Us Weekly, refuting allegations of jealousy.

    Mangione, accused of murdering UnitedHealthcare CEO Brian Thompson in a case involving terrorism-related charges, arrived at the detention center in December 2024 after pleading not guilty to multiple charges. Diddy, who has been at the same facility since September 2024 on sex trafficking and racketeering charges, also maintains his innocence.

    The two high-profile inmates are not only connected by their location but also share legal representation ties. Mangione recently retained Karen Friedman Agnifilo to represent him in New York, while Diddy’s defense is being handled by her husband, Marc Agnifilo. A spokesperson for Agnifilo Intrater LLP confirmed Mangione’s legal representation but stated that no further comments would be made at this time.

    Both men face challenging circumstances in the notoriously tough Metropolitan Detention Center, which has previously housed high-profile figures such as Sam Bankman-Fried, R. Kelly, Ghislaine Maxwell, and Keith Raniere. Diddy’s lawyer, Marc Agnifilo, has publicly voiced concerns about the jail’s conditions.

    “The food is inedible, from what I’ve been told,” Agnifilo said in a September 2024 interview after Diddy was denied bail. “It’s violent. Someone like Mr. Combs might be a target for certain things. We can’t let that happen.” Despite four separate bail appeals, Diddy remains detained.

    Former inmates have also described the Metropolitan Detention Center in grim terms. One individual, who spent three months there in 2019, called it a “terrible, horrible place” with no air circulation and subpar food.

    As both legal cases unfold, Diddy and Mangione remain at the center of media and public scrutiny, with connections and controversies continuing to surround their shared confinement.

    #Diddy #LuigiMangione #MetropolitanDetentionCenter #CelebrityNews #HighProfileCases #LegalDrama #NYCNews

    Want to listen to ALL of our podcasts AD-FREE? Subscribe through APPLE PODCASTS, and try it for three days free: https://tinyurl.com/ycw626tj
    Follow Our Other Cases: https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com
    The latest on The Downfall of Diddy, The Trial of Karen Read, The Murder Of Maddie Soto, Catching the Long Island Serial Killer, Awaiting Admission: BTK’s Unconfessed Crimes, Delphi Murders: Inside the Crime, Chad & Lori Daybell, The Murder of Ana Walshe, Alex Murdaugh, Bryan Kohberger, Lucy Letby, Kouri Richins, Malevolent Mormon Mommys, The Menendez Brothers: Quest For Justice, The Murder of Stephen Smith, The Murder of Madeline Kingsbury, The Murder Of Sandra Birchmore, and much more! Listen at https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com


    Show more Show less
    9 mins
  • Defense Challenges DNA Evidence in Bryan Kohberger Murder Case
    Jan 9 2025
    Attorneys for Bryan Kohberger have accused investigators of mishandling key evidence and using aggressive search tactics in the case linking him to the killings of four University of Idaho students in November 2022. In court filings, the defense is asking the court to exclude evidence it claims was improperly obtained, including DNA, digital accounts, and information from expert witnesses.

    In recently submitted documents, Kohberger’s defense argues that investigative genetic genealogy—used to connect DNA collected at the crime scene to Kohberger’s family home in Pennsylvania—is both "unreliable and controversial." According to the defense, “The investigators’ methods show a disregard for protocols, effectively destroying the house to save the car, or some other evidence, from Mr. Kohberger’s rubber gloves.”

    Kohberger was arrested on Dec. 30, 2022, in Pennsylvania, following a month-long investigation into the Nov. 13 stabbings of Kaylee Goncalves, Madison Mogen, Xana Kernodle, and Ethan Chapin. The students were found dead in their rental home near the University of Idaho campus.

    Prosecutors have maintained that DNA collected from the crime scene matches Kohberger’s DNA, which was obtained from his family residence. Despite this claim, the defense is challenging the admissibility of such evidence, citing concerns over the reliability of investigative genetic genealogy.

    The defense has also taken issue with how investigators collected evidence from Kohberger’s digital accounts, including his Apple iCloud, Google, and Amazon profiles. These filings accuse the prosecution of failing to provide adequate disclosure regarding the experts expected to testify at trial, labeling the lack of transparency as a violation of due process.

    The defense team has requested that the court impose sanctions on prosecutors for their handling of discovery and pretrial evidence-sharing obligations.

    Kohberger, a former criminology student, was indicted last year on four counts of first-degree murder and one count of burglary. He chose to remain silent during his arraignment, prompting Latah County Judge John Judge to enter not guilty pleas on his behalf.

    The case, which was transferred to Ada County, is expected to move to trial in August. The parties are scheduled to return to court on Jan. 23 to address the defense’s allegations of evidence mishandling and procedural misconduct.

    As the trial date approaches, both sides are preparing for an intense legal battle over the validity of the evidence. The defense’s challenges, particularly regarding DNA and digital evidence, could significantly shape the outcome of this high-profile case.

    #BryanKohberger #IdahoMurders #CriminalDefense #DNAEvidence #LegalChallenges #UniversityOfIdaho #TrueCrime

    Want to listen to ALL of our podcasts AD-FREE? Subscribe through APPLE PODCASTS, and try it for three days free: https://tinyurl.com/ycw626tj
    Follow Our Other Cases: https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com
    The latest on The Downfall of Diddy, The Trial of Karen Read, The Murder Of Maddie Soto, Catching the Long Island Serial Killer, Awaiting Admission: BTK’s Unconfessed Crimes, Delphi Murders: Inside the Crime, Chad & Lori Daybell, The Murder of Ana Walshe, Alex Murdaugh, Bryan Kohberger, Lucy Letby, Kouri Richins, Malevolent Mormon Mommys, The Menendez Brothers: Quest For Justice, The Murder of Stephen Smith, The Murder of Madeline Kingsbury, The Murder Of Sandra Birchmore, and much more! Listen at https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com
    Show more Show less
    15 mins
  • Defense Challenges DNA Evidence in Gilgo Beach Serial Killer Case
    Jan 9 2025
    Rex Heuermann, the alleged Gilgo Beach serial killer charged with murdering seven women, is challenging key DNA evidence ahead of his trial. His defense team is urging the judge to exclude nuclear DNA results derived from hairs found at six crime scenes, arguing the scientific methods used are unreliable.

    The case, which has captured national attention, hinges on evidence gathered by the Suffolk County District Attorney's office and the Gilgo Beach Task Force, led by DA Ray Tierney. Heuermann, an architect, husband, and father of two from Massapequa Park, denies involvement in the killings.

    Tierney addressed the defense’s motion, saying, "We're not going to engage in what ifs. Obviously, that's among many other key components of our case, so we're prepared to defend it."

    Heuermann's attorneys filed the motion in Central Islip this week, asserting that the DNA technique employed by Astrea Forensics, a California-based lab, lacks widespread acceptance in the scientific community. This motion initiates pretrial hearings to determine whether the evidence will be admissible at trial.

    "If we weren't confident in the efficacy and the admissibility of that evidence, we would not have used it," Tierney stated.

    Prosecutors believe the DNA evidence ties Heuermann to the alleged crimes. Successfully excluding the evidence could weaken the prosecution’s case. However, Tierney expressed readiness for the challenge, adding, "We’ll abide by the mandates of the court, we’ll have the hearing, and we’re looking forward to doing so."

    The hearing on the DNA admissibility is set to occur this winter. Depending on its outcome and the time required to address other challenges, the trial could begin later this year or early 2026.

    Heuermann, who was arrested last year, is also suspected in other unsolved murders connected to Gilgo Beach. However, Tierney clarified, "We don’t make any assumptions, we just continue to work the evidence and see where that evidence leads."

    The next court date for Heuermann is January 15, where further developments in the case may unfold.

    #GilgoBeach #RexHeuermann #TrueCrime #DNAEvidence #CriminalTrial #JusticeForVictims #SerialKiller

    Want to listen to ALL of our podcasts AD-FREE? Subscribe through APPLE PODCASTS, and try it for three days free: https://tinyurl.com/ycw626tj
    Follow Our Other Cases: https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com
    The latest on The Downfall of Diddy, The Trial of Karen Read, The Murder Of Maddie Soto, Catching the Long Island Serial Killer, Awaiting Admission: BTK’s Unconfessed Crimes, Delphi Murders: Inside the Crime, Chad & Lori Daybell, The Murder of Ana Walshe, Alex Murdaugh, Bryan Kohberger, Lucy Letby, Kouri Richins, Malevolent Mormon Mommys, The Menendez Brothers: Quest For Justice, The Murder of Stephen Smith, The Murder of Madeline Kingsbury, The Murder Of Sandra Birchmore, and much more! Listen at https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com
    Show more Show less
    11 mins