Episodes

  • Adria English And Her First (Under New Lawyers) Amended Complaint (Part 4) (1/12/25)

    Adria English And Her First (Under New Lawyers) Amended Complaint (Part 4) (1/12/25)
    Jan 12 2025
    In the case of English v. Combs et al. (Case No. 1:24-cv-05090), plaintiff Adria English has filed a First Amended Complaint in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York. The lawsuit names multiple defendants, including Sean Combs (also known as "P. Diddy"), Bad Boy Entertainment Holdings, Inc., Sean John Clothing LLC, Inc., Combs Global Enterprises, and others. English alleges that she was subjected to sexual assault, harassment, and exploitation by the defendants, detailing incidents that purportedly occurred over a significant period. The complaint includes claims of physical and emotional abuse, asserting that the defendants engaged in a pattern of misconduct that caused her substantial harm.

    The amended complaint expands upon the original allegations, providing additional details and incorporating new claims against the defendants. English seeks compensatory and punitive damages, as well as injunctive relief, citing violations of her civil rights and other legal protections. The case has garnered attention due to the high-profile nature of the defendants and the serious nature of the allegations. As the litigation proceeds, both parties are expected to engage in extensive discovery and pretrial motions, with the potential for significant legal and public relations implications.



    (commercial at 8:25)

    to contact me:

    bobbycapucci@protonmail.com



    source:

    English
    Show more Show less
    13 mins
  • Adria English And Her First (Under New Lawyers) Amended Complaint (Part 3) (1/12/25)

    Adria English And Her First (Under New Lawyers) Amended Complaint (Part 3) (1/12/25)
    Jan 12 2025
    In the case of English v. Combs et al. (Case No. 1:24-cv-05090), plaintiff Adria English has filed a First Amended Complaint in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York. The lawsuit names multiple defendants, including Sean Combs (also known as "P. Diddy"), Bad Boy Entertainment Holdings, Inc., Sean John Clothing LLC, Inc., Combs Global Enterprises, and others. English alleges that she was subjected to sexual assault, harassment, and exploitation by the defendants, detailing incidents that purportedly occurred over a significant period. The complaint includes claims of physical and emotional abuse, asserting that the defendants engaged in a pattern of misconduct that caused her substantial harm.

    The amended complaint expands upon the original allegations, providing additional details and incorporating new claims against the defendants. English seeks compensatory and punitive damages, as well as injunctive relief, citing violations of her civil rights and other legal protections. The case has garnered attention due to the high-profile nature of the defendants and the serious nature of the allegations. As the litigation proceeds, both parties are expected to engage in extensive discovery and pretrial motions, with the potential for significant legal and public relations implications.



    (commercial at 8:49)

    to contact me:

    bobbycapucci@protonmail.com



    source:

    English
    Show more Show less
    15 mins
  • Diddy's Fellow Travelers: Priced For A Prince (1/12/25)

    Diddy's Fellow Travelers: Priced For A Prince (1/12/25)
    Jan 12 2025
    According to court documents, Virginia Roberts was paid 15 thousand dollars after Jeffrey Epstein and Ghislaine Maxwell allegedly trafficked her to Prince Andrew.


    The report falls in line with the literally hundreds of other similar reports out there, where Epstein and Maxwell attempted to pay their victims, so that later on down the road they could claim that it was nothing more than solicitation. Considering how well that strategy worked for him in Florida, is it any wonder he kept it up?



    (commercial at 8:45)

    to contact me:

    bobbycapucci@protonmail.com



    source:

    Jeffrey Epstein 'paid Virginia Giuffre $15K to have sex with Prince Andrew at 17,' latest bombshell docs claim | The Sun
    Show more Show less
    13 mins
  • How We Got Here: The Opposition To Diddy's Motion For List Of Particulars, Gag Order (Part 5)

    How We Got Here: The Opposition To Diddy's Motion For List Of Particulars, Gag Order (Part 5)
    Jan 12 2025
    In the case of United States v. Sean Combs (24 Cr. 542), federal prosecutors have filed an opposition to the defense's motions requesting a hearing, a bill of particulars, and a gag order. The defense sought a hearing to investigate alleged government leaks of evidence, specifically a 2016 video purportedly showing Combs assaulting his ex-girlfriend, Cassie Ventura. Prosecutors refuted these claims, stating they did not possess the video prior to its public release and had no involvement in its dissemination. They argued that the defense's allegations are baseless and represent a strategic attempt to suppress critical evidence that is highly probative of Combs' alleged criminal conduct.


    Regarding the request for a bill of particulars, the defense sought detailed information about the charges to prepare for trial. Prosecutors contended that the indictment already provides sufficient detail, outlining the nature of the charges and the alleged criminal activities. They maintained that additional specifics are unnecessary and could compromise ongoing investigations or witness safety. Concerning the motion for a gag order to prevent public statements by potential witnesses and attorneys, prosecutors argued that existing court orders already address these concerns, rendering the defense's request redundant. They emphasized the importance of balancing the defendant's right to a fair trial with the public's right to information, asserting that current measures are adequate to maintain this balance.



    (commercial at 8:07)

    to contact me:

    bobbycapucci@protonmail.com



    source:

    diddy.pdf
    Show more Show less
    18 mins
  • How We Got Here: The Opposition To Diddy's Motion For List Of Particulars, Gag Order (Part 4)

    How We Got Here: The Opposition To Diddy's Motion For List Of Particulars, Gag Order (Part 4)
    Jan 12 2025
    In the case of United States v. Sean Combs (24 Cr. 542), federal prosecutors have filed an opposition to the defense's motions requesting a hearing, a bill of particulars, and a gag order. The defense sought a hearing to investigate alleged government leaks of evidence, specifically a 2016 video purportedly showing Combs assaulting his ex-girlfriend, Cassie Ventura. Prosecutors refuted these claims, stating they did not possess the video prior to its public release and had no involvement in its dissemination. They argued that the defense's allegations are baseless and represent a strategic attempt to suppress critical evidence that is highly probative of Combs' alleged criminal conduct.


    Regarding the request for a bill of particulars, the defense sought detailed information about the charges to prepare for trial. Prosecutors contended that the indictment already provides sufficient detail, outlining the nature of the charges and the alleged criminal activities. They maintained that additional specifics are unnecessary and could compromise ongoing investigations or witness safety. Concerning the motion for a gag order to prevent public statements by potential witnesses and attorneys, prosecutors argued that existing court orders already address these concerns, rendering the defense's request redundant. They emphasized the importance of balancing the defendant's right to a fair trial with the public's right to information, asserting that current measures are adequate to maintain this balance.



    (commercial at 8:07)

    to contact me:

    bobbycapucci@protonmail.com



    source:

    diddy.pdf
    Show more Show less
    11 mins
  • How We Got Here: The Opposition To Diddy's Motion For List Of Particulars, Gag Order (Part 3))

    How We Got Here: The Opposition To Diddy's Motion For List Of Particulars, Gag Order (Part 3))
    Jan 12 2025
    In the case of United States v. Sean Combs (24 Cr. 542), federal prosecutors have filed an opposition to the defense's motions requesting a hearing, a bill of particulars, and a gag order. The defense sought a hearing to investigate alleged government leaks of evidence, specifically a 2016 video purportedly showing Combs assaulting his ex-girlfriend, Cassie Ventura. Prosecutors refuted these claims, stating they did not possess the video prior to its public release and had no involvement in its dissemination. They argued that the defense's allegations are baseless and represent a strategic attempt to suppress critical evidence that is highly probative of Combs' alleged criminal conduct.


    Regarding the request for a bill of particulars, the defense sought detailed information about the charges to prepare for trial. Prosecutors contended that the indictment already provides sufficient detail, outlining the nature of the charges and the alleged criminal activities. They maintained that additional specifics are unnecessary and could compromise ongoing investigations or witness safety. Concerning the motion for a gag order to prevent public statements by potential witnesses and attorneys, prosecutors argued that existing court orders already address these concerns, rendering the defense's request redundant. They emphasized the importance of balancing the defendant's right to a fair trial with the public's right to information, asserting that current measures are adequate to maintain this balance.



    (commercial at 8:07)

    to contact me:

    bobbycapucci@protonmail.com



    source:

    diddy.pdf
    Show more Show less
    11 mins
  • How We Got Here: The Opposition To Diddy's Motion For List Of Particulars, Gag Order (Part 2)

    How We Got Here: The Opposition To Diddy's Motion For List Of Particulars, Gag Order (Part 2)
    Jan 12 2025
    In the case of United States v. Sean Combs (24 Cr. 542), federal prosecutors have filed an opposition to the defense's motions requesting a hearing, a bill of particulars, and a gag order. The defense sought a hearing to investigate alleged government leaks of evidence, specifically a 2016 video purportedly showing Combs assaulting his ex-girlfriend, Cassie Ventura. Prosecutors refuted these claims, stating they did not possess the video prior to its public release and had no involvement in its dissemination. They argued that the defense's allegations are baseless and represent a strategic attempt to suppress critical evidence that is highly probative of Combs' alleged criminal conduct.


    Regarding the request for a bill of particulars, the defense sought detailed information about the charges to prepare for trial. Prosecutors contended that the indictment already provides sufficient detail, outlining the nature of the charges and the alleged criminal activities. They maintained that additional specifics are unnecessary and could compromise ongoing investigations or witness safety. Concerning the motion for a gag order to prevent public statements by potential witnesses and attorneys, prosecutors argued that existing court orders already address these concerns, rendering the defense's request redundant. They emphasized the importance of balancing the defendant's right to a fair trial with the public's right to information, asserting that current measures are adequate to maintain this balance.



    (commercial at 8:07)

    to contact me:

    bobbycapucci@protonmail.com



    source:

    diddy.pdf
    Show more Show less
    13 mins