In this episode of "Thinking Out Loud," host Meseidy is joined by from the Instagram account “Here are the Headlines” and the Substack “Rachel Reeves Writes.” The pair dive deep into the recent guilty verdict of former president Donald Trump and the Republican Presidential nominee on 34 felony counts of falsifying business records.

Join the chat and tell us what you think!

Become a subscriber! Discount 30% off annual subscription ($35 a year)

Connect

Connect with Meseidy on Instagram @ItsMeseidy or via email at meseidy@itsmeseidy.com.

* It’s Meseidy Substack

* Instagram

* X

* Email

Connect with Rachel

* Substack

* Instagram

* X

In this episode of "Thinking Out Loud," host Meseidy is joined by Rachel Reeves from the Instagram account “Here are the Headlines” and the Substack “Rachel Reeves Writes.” The pair dive deep into the Alabama Supreme Court's recent ruling on frozen embryos, sparking a wide-ranging discussion that touches on news sourcing, the implications of the ruling, and broader societal issues.

Episode Summary:

Meseidy and Rachel dissect the Alabama Supreme Court's groundbreaking ruling on frozen embryos. This episode delves into the legal, ethical, and social ramifications of considering embryos as persons, not property, and explores the potential impact on IVF treatments, media representation, and political narratives. Whether you're deeply invested in the implications of this case or curious about the broader debate it ignites, this episode offers critical insights and thoughtful analysis.

Key Points Discussed:

* The Alabama Supreme Court Ruling: The court decided that frozen embryos from IVF treatments are considered persons, not property, stirring significant debate and media frenzy.

* Media Representation and Bias: Meseidy and Rachel critique the media's portrayal of the ruling, highlighting scare tactics and misrepresentations, especially regarding the citation of the Bible within the court's opinion.

* The Role of Social Media and News Platforms: The duo shares their experiences with sourcing news and the importance of platforms like Instagram and X (formerly Twitter) in shaping public discourse.

* Ethical and Social Implications: The conversation covers the ethical dilemmas of IVF, the sanctity of life, and how this ruling intersects with broader societal issues, including the future of reproductive technologies and the political weaponization of court decisions.

* Personal Stories and Perspectives: Rachel and Meseidy share their personal journeys and views, offering a nuanced take on the complex emotions and ethical considerations surrounding IVF and fertility.a

Referenced Materials

Alabama Supreme Court Ruling SC-2022-0515

Alabama Human Life Protection Act Definitions Ala. Code § 26-23H-3

Alabama "Brody Act" Act No. 2006-419

Alabama Constitution of 1901, Art. I, § 36.06

Under the Desk News Commentary

This is Part 2 in the series Twitter Files for Dummies.

How Congress and the FBI applied pressure on Twitter to comply with moderation requests.

Breaking down Twitter Files threads #11, HOW TWITTER LET THE INTELLIGENCE COMMUNITY IN and #12, TWITTER AND THE FBI “BELLY BUTTON”

Episode Article: https://www.itsmeseidy.com/p/twitter-files-for-dummies-part-2#details

In this series Twitter Files for Dummies, I cover the Twitter Files in chronological order group by topic, which will sometimes be in a different order from the Twitter Files thread release.

Connect with Meseidy

Substack

Instagram

Twitter