Episode site

In the closing bonus episode, Casper and I dive deeper into what separates good communication from great. We explore cultural nuance, consistency in tone, creative content delivery, and the irreplaceable value of trained communicators. Using real-life metaphors and practical examples, the duo push for a shift in mindset: from vanity metrics to real engagement, from generic posts to emotionally resonant messaging. It’s a compelling call to prioritize storytelling and impact over automation and shortcuts.

Episode site

In the final Communication Shorts episode, Casper and I take stock of everything covered in the 12-episode series. Through a lively, reflective conversation, we revisit the four communication pillars: strategy, media engagement, newsletters, and social media. The episode explores why communication should not be treated as an afterthought or junior task but as a core, strategic function in EU projects. They underline the importance of storytelling, consistent messaging, and internal buy-in—while challenging listeners to consider the real value of professional communication expertise.

Episode site

In this episode I have invited back Ilaria Rudisi, a senior EU funding consultant, to explore how researchers can successfully prepare proposals for the Marie Skłodowska-Curie Actions (MSCA). Ilaria takes us through the entire proposal development process — from evaluating the feasibility of the research idea to building a competitive, impact-driven narrative. She further shares practical insights from her extensive consulting work, emphasizing the importance of early planning, clear articulation of impact, and understanding the expectations of the evaluators.

Listeners will gain an in-depth understanding of the structure and requirements of MSCA proposals, including how to write the B1 and B2 sections, define work packages, plan budgets, and address ethics and risk. The conversation also touches on the psychological and strategic dynamics between researchers and consultants, and why MSCA is not a good fit for everyone. This episode is a hands-on guide to building competitive proposals and a reality check for researchers who might be overconfident about the strength of their ideas.

Time codes:

00:01:42 Introduction

00:05:24 Fly in on MSCA

00:11:42 Preparation

00:32:24 Shaping of proposal concept with researcher

00:42:19 Pen to paper

01:19:15 Submission

01:29:10 The toughest challenge

Episode site

In the first episode of the new SMEs Series, I sit down with Alicja Grzegorzek Carrascosa (Co-founder of Polite Europe) to tackle one of the most complex issues facing SMEs in EU projects: understanding eligibility rules. The episode digs into the distinctions between SME owners and employees, how their time can be charged in projects, and the two main reimbursement routes — actual costs and unit costs — while highlighting the critical impact these choices can have in audits.

Alicja gives a detailed understanding of real-life scenarios across EU countries (including Spain, France, and Belgium), how holding structures and grey zones complicate compliance, and why it's vital to document decisions and consult with project officers, National Contact Points, and auditors. The episode offers not just clarity but also strategies for de-risking participation in EU projects — a must-listen for SME owners, grant consultants, and public facilitators supporting them.

Time codes:

00:02:14 Introduction

00:06:20 Fly in

00:08:19 SME eligibility issues

00:20:07 Practical advice for SMEs

00:31:44 The toughest challenge

Episode site

In this second half of The Grant’s Innovation Fund introduction, Irene Larroy from EY shares with us the complex application and evaluation landscape of one of the EU’s most ambitious funding instruments for decarbonisation. In this second part we go through step-by-step the grant application process—what documents are required, how feasibility studies and financial modeling fit into the process, and what it takes to calculate eligible costs using the dreaded Excel templates. Irene shares hard-earned insights into what makes proposals successful (or not), especially in relation to key documents like the GHG emissions calculator and the financial maturity documentation.

The episode also examines how Innovation Fund proposals are evaluated: from the role of expert panels to the five core evaluation criteria—degree of innovation, GHG reduction, project maturity, replicability, and cost-efficiency. Bonus points, controversial scoring issues, and evaluation fairness across sectors are addressed with practical advice for applicants. Finally, we have a look at what happens after winning the grant, including negotiations, financial close, and the grant agreement phase—plus a few project success stories to bring it all to life.

Time codes:

00:02:06 How to apply

00:16:54 Evaluation

00:46:59 When receiving funding

01:00:38 Do's and don't's

01:07:32 The toughest challenge

Episode site

In this Funding Scheme episode of The Grant, I invite Irene LaRoy, Innovation Fund expert and Partner at EY, to give us all an intruction to one of EU’s flagship funding programs: the Innovation Fund. We look into why the European Commission launched theInnovation Fund as part of the European Green Deal — aiming to decarbonize heavy industry by directly supporting the construction of large-scale facilities. Irene explains the unique structure of the programme, including the different project categories (small, medium, large, pilot, and clean tech manufacturing) and the heavy focus on industrial-scale deployment rather than research.

The episode sheds light on how Innovation Fund projects are evaluated, how relevant costs are calculated, and why financial close is a crucial milestone. It highlights theInnovation Fund’s distinctive character: it’s financed through the EU’s Emissions Trading System (ETS) and operates with stringent technical and financial demands. Finally, we look into why applying for the Innovation Fund demands strategic commitment, top-level management buy-in, and an intricate balance between innovation, technical readiness, and financial solidity.

This is a double episode. In this first episode we dig into why the EU Commission established this initiative, the structure of the programme and the target group and stakeholders. Very instructive for everybody who is approaching the funding scheme.

Time codes:

00:01:50 Introduction

00:07:44 Fly in on Innovation Fund

00:09:26 EU background for the funding scheme

00:14:25 Structure of the programme

00:50:56 Target groups

Episode site

Together with Stephanie Harfensteller, EU Research Coordinator at FIR an der RWTH Aachen, I am launching the first episode of the Research Manager Shorts Series.

In this first one we discuss how research support units can be strategically developed within institutions. The conversation explores what it takes to set up and scale research management—from convincing leadership to creating internal awareness of the function’s value. Stephanie shares her experience establishing the research management function at research institute, how she identified internal "pain points," and how she framed these challenges as strategic opportunities that aligned with broader institutional goals.

The episode highlights how professionalizing research support is not only about writing better proposals but about improving long-term sustainability, compliance, and impact. Topics include building internal visibility, tailoring support to researchers' actual needs, and working across silos to embed research strategy into the daily rhythm of the organization. Whether you're starting from scratch or scaling an existing support structure, this episode offers practical insights on transforming research management into a strategic asset.

Time codes:

00:02:45 Introduction

00:05:46 First motivation

00:09:48 Management commitment

00:14:07 Considerations before starting - Motivation

00:22:25 Considerations before starting - Challenges

00:28:32 Connection with overall organizational strategy

Episode site

In the second half of this Implementation Series double episode on communication and dissemination, my two guests Anna-Maria Czarny and Maëla Barçon from Hanse-Parlament move into unfolding dissemination in EU-funded projects. They unpack what dissemination really means, how it differs from communication, and why the two must work in sync. The discussion includes concrete strategies like using targeted knowledge platforms, printed materials for traditional audiences, and tailoring approaches to each project’s specific socio-economic environment.

The episode also explores operational best practices—from organizing partner collaboration and indicators, to planning events that meaningfully present project results. My dear guests share candid stories, such as how a single presentation led to EU-level recognition, and why printing a book might still be your best dissemination tool. The conversation wraps up with useful do's and don'ts, like staying flexible, knowing your target groups, and never sidelining dissemination just because “you’ll do it later.”

Time codes:

00:01:41 The dissemination activities

00:28:38 Synergies

00:31:50 Organisation, collaboration and formalities

00:46:30 Do's and don't's

00:51:41 The toughest challenge